Background: The impact of pregnancy on levels of biologic agents in patients with IBD is undefined and time to elimination in vedolizumab-exposed infants is unknown.
Aims: To determine the effect of pregnancy on infliximab, adalimumab and vedolizumab levels and to study infant vedolizumab clearance METHODS: In a prospective observational study, maternal drug levels were measured pre-conception, in each trimester, at delivery and postpartum. The association between drug levels and gestation in weeks was assessed using generalised estimating equation modelling. Infant vedolizumab levels were performed at birth (cord blood), 6 weeks and 3 months or until undetectable.
Results: We included 50 IBD patients (23 on infliximab, 15 on adalimumab and 12 on vedolizumab) with at least two intrapartum observations, plus 5 patients on vedolizumab with only mother and baby samples at delivery. Modelling showed no change in adalimumab levels, an increase in infliximab levels of 0.16 (95% CI 0.08-0.24) µg/L/week (P < 0.001) and a decrease of 0.18 (95% CI: -0.33 to -0.02) µg/L/week (P = 0.03) for vedolizumab. In 17 mother-baby pairs, median infant vedolizumab levels at birth were lower than maternal levels (P < 0.05) with an infant:maternal ratio of 0.7 (IQR 0.5-0.9). Vedolizumab was undetectable between 15 and 16 weeks of age in all 12 infants completing follow-up testing.
Conclusions: During pregnancy, adalimumab levels remain stable, while infliximab levels increase and vedolizumab levels decrease. However, the increments were small suggesting that intrapartum therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment are not indicated. Unlike infliximab and adalimumab, infant vedolizumab levels are lower in cord blood than in mothers and appear to clear rapidly.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16102 | DOI Listing |
Background: The armamentarium of medical therapies to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to grow, which has expanded treatment options, particularly after first biologic failure. Currently, there are limited studies investigating the predictive value of first biologic primary non-response (PNR) on subsequent biologic success. Our objective was to determine if PNR to the first biologic for IBD is predictive of response to subsequent biologic therapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeadache
January 2025
Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Objective: This systematic review aims to consolidate and analyze the existing evidence on Tolosa-Hunt syndrome (THS) in the pediatric population, focusing on clinical features, diagnostic challenges, treatment outcomes, and prognosis.
Background: Tolosa-Hunt syndrome is a rare headache disorder caused by idiopathic inflammation of the cavernous sinus, orbital apex, or orbit, resulting in neuro-ophthalmological manifestations. It is uniquely characterized by cranial nerve palsies and often responds well to steroids.
J Crohns Colitis
January 2025
Amsterdam UMC, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Introduction: It remains unclear why up to 30% of ulcerative colitis patients (UC) do not respond to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Validated biomarkers for (non-)response ((N)R) are lacking. Most studies investigating underlying mechanisms do not differentiate between pharmacokinetic and inflammatory mechanisms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Ther
December 2024
Analysis Group, Inc, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Purpose: In ulcerative colitis (UC), anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents often are first-line biologic therapy. Switching to a biologic with a different mode of action (ustekinumab and vedolizumab) or cycling to another anti-TNF agent (adalimumab, infliximab, and golimumab) is necessary if an initial anti-TNF fails. This study compared real-world persistence in patients with UC who switched to a biologic with a different mode of action or cycled with another anti-TNF after nonresponse to an anti-TNF.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Gastroenterol
December 2024
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Branch, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5, Fu-Hsin Street, Guei-Shan District, Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan.
Background/aims: The increasing use of biologic therapies for moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) highlights the importance of optimal treatment sequencing, particularly after vedolizumab (VDZ) exposure. Studies comparing the effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) and antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents post-VDZ are limited.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed VDZ-experienced IBD patients treated with UST or anti-TNF (adalimumab and infliximab) from May 2019 to January 2024.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!