AI Article Synopsis

  • The study presents the GRADE approach for evaluating the certainty of evidence derived from modeling studies in health contexts.
  • Development involved expert consultations and an international workshop to refine concepts and terminology used for assessing evidence certainty in systematic reviews and health care decisions.
  • The framework proposed includes selecting evidence from new models, existing models, or multiple models while maintaining fidelity to GRADE domains like risk of bias and inconsistency.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the study is to present the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) conceptual approach to the assessment of certainty of evidence from modeling studies (i.e., certainty associated with model outputs).

Study Design And Setting: Expert consultations and an international multidisciplinary workshop informed development of a conceptual approach to assessing the certainty of evidence from models within the context of systematic reviews, health technology assessments, and health care decisions. The discussions also clarified selected concepts and terminology used in the GRADE approach and by the modeling community. Feedback from experts in a broad range of modeling and health care disciplines addressed the content validity of the approach.

Results: Workshop participants agreed that the domains determining the certainty of evidence previously identified in the GRADE approach (risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision, reporting bias, magnitude of an effect, dose-response relation, and the direction of residual confounding) also apply when assessing the certainty of evidence from models. The assessment depends on the nature of model inputs and the model itself and on whether one is evaluating evidence from a single model or multiple models. We propose a framework for selecting the best available evidence from models: 1) developing de novo, a model specific to the situation of interest, 2) identifying an existing model, the outputs of which provide the highest certainty evidence for the situation of interest, either "off-the-shelf" or after adaptation, and 3) using outputs from multiple models. We also present a summary of preferred terminology to facilitate communication among modeling and health care disciplines.

Conclusion: This conceptual GRADE approach provides a framework for using evidence from models in health decision-making and the assessment of certainty of evidence from a model or models. The GRADE Working Group and the modeling community are currently developing the detailed methods and related guidance for assessing specific domains determining the certainty of evidence from models across health care-related disciplines (e.g., therapeutic decision-making, toxicology, environmental health, and health economics).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514123PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

certainty evidence
28
evidence models
20
grade approach
16
health care
12
evidence
10
approach assessing
8
conceptual approach
8
certainty
8
assessment certainty
8
assessing certainty
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!