Effects of straw returning levels on carbon footprint and net ecosystem economic benefits from rice-wheat rotation in central China.

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int

MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River/College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.

Published: February 2021

Straw returning usually gives rise to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the soil, and thus negatively affects carbon footprint (CF) of crop production. Numerous studies reported the effects of straw returning on the CF from single crop production. However, little is known about the integrated effects of different levels of straw returning on the CF and net ecosystem economic benefits (NEEB) from rice-wheat rotation. Here, we investigated the effects of different amounts of straw returning on soil CH and NO emissions, GHG emissions from agricultural inputs (AIGHG), CF, and NEEB from a 2-year cycle of rice-wheat rotation. The CF was determined based on the total GHG emissions associated with crop production inputs and services. Overall, straw returning significantly increased annual CH emissions by 5.4-72.2% and reduced annual NO emissions by 3.3-31.4% compared with straw removal. Straw returning remarkably increased rice grain yields by 8.1-9.9% and wheat grain yields by 10.2-21.1% compared with straw removal. The average annual AIGHG from rice-wheat rotation ranged from 3579 to 4987 kg CO-eq ha. Diesel consumption played a dominant role in the AIGHG. The annual CF ranged from 0.96 to 1.31 kg CO-eq kg and increased with increasing straw returning amounts. The NEEB, which ranged from 14161 to 17413 CNY ha, was significantly affected by the levels of straw returning. The treatment with returning of 1/3 of preceding crop straw to the field (2.19-2.47 kg ha year of rice straw in the wheat season and 1.38-1.68 kg ha year of wheat straw in the rice season) resulted in relatively higher grain yield, the lowest CF, and the highest NEEB among all treatments, and thus can reduce CF, and increase grain yields and NEEB, and thus can be recommended as a sustainable approach to mitigate GHG emissions and increase economic benefits from rice-wheat rotation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10914-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

straw returning
36
rice-wheat rotation
20
ghg emissions
16
straw
13
economic benefits
12
crop production
12
grain yields
12
returning
10
effects straw
8
carbon footprint
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!