Although head injuries are common in cycling, exact conditions associated with cyclist head impacts are difficult to determine. Previous studies have attempted to reverse engineer cyclist head impacts by reconstructing bicycle helmet residual damage, but they have been limited by simplified damage assessment and testing. The present study seeks to enhance knowledge of cyclist head impact conditions by reconstructing helmet damage using advanced impact testing and damage quantification techniques. Damage to 18 helmets from cyclists treated in emergency departments was quantified using computed tomography and reconstructed using oblique impacts. Damage metrics were related to normal and tangential velocities from impact tests as well as peak linear accelerations (PLA) and peak rotational velocities (PRV) using case-specific regression models. Models then allowed original impact conditions and kinematics to be estimated for each case. Helmets were most frequently damaged at the front and sides, often near the rim. Concussion was the most common, non-superficial head injury. Normal velocity and PLA distributions were similar to previous studies, with median values of 3.4 m/s and 102.5 g. Associated tangential velocity and PRV medians were 3.8 m/s and 22.3 rad/s. Results can inform future oblique impact testing conditions, enabling improved helmet evaluation and design.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02620-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cyclist head
16
head impacts
12
bicycle helmet
8
helmet damage
8
oblique impacts
8
computed tomography
8
previous studies
8
impact conditions
8
impact testing
8
damage
7

Similar Publications

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) in cyclists is a growing public health problem, with helmets being the major protection gear. Finite element head models have been increasingly used to engineer safer helmets often by mitigating brain strain peaks. However, how different helmets alter the spatial distribution of brain strain remains largely unknown.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: COVID-19 was first reported in Wuhan, China, and subsequently spread worldwide. There were numerous restrictions on daily life activities, including lifestyles, social distancing, isolation and access to many forms of exercise and home confinement. All these activities have health benefits, as they enhance the immune system, which is the need of the hour during the COVID-19 pandemic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Injury risk curves are vital in quantifying the relative safety consequences of real-world collisions. Previous injury risk curves for bicycle-passenger vehicle crashes have predominantly focused on frontal impacts. This creates a gap in cyclist injury risk assessment for other geometric crash configurations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Behaviour of motorcyclists and bicyclists before and after a road safety campaign, China.

Bull World Health Organ

November 2024

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics; Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, 172 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, 410013, China.

Objective: To examine changes in red-light running and distracted riding among motorcyclists and cyclists before and after the 2020 implementation of the One Helmet, One Seatbelt campaign in China.

Methods: We obtained 192 hours of film before (2019) and after (2021) implementation of the campaign in eight road intersections in Changsha. We calculated percentages and ratios of red-light running and distracted riding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How Well Do Popular Bicycle Helmets Protect from Different Types of Head Injury?

Ann Biomed Eng

December 2024

HEAD Lab, Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.

Article Synopsis
  • Bicycle helmets primarily protect against skull fractures but their effectiveness against diffuse brain injuries is less understood.
  • The study tested 30 popular helmets under various impact conditions to evaluate protection against linear and rotational forces, revealing significant variations in performance.
  • Helmets with MIPS technology generally performed better in reducing rotational forces, but price did not correlate with injury risk, indicating that not all expensive helmets offer better protection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!