While protective orders remain a commonly used resource, multiply marginalized survivors are often unable to file for, obtain, serve, and enforce orders. I argue that using structural intersectionality as a method is the best way to reveal how the protective order process replicates broader social inequalities. I advocate for an alternative way of using structural intersectionality. I first identify the mechanisms by which inequalities exist and then describe how these can be traced back to intersecting social identities. In doing so, I highlight the importance of historical context and the blurring of the civil and criminal legal systems.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801220958495 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!