A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae cfDNA in pleural fluid and its clinical value. | LitMetric

Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae cfDNA in pleural fluid and its clinical value.

Ann Palliat Med

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.

Published: September 2020

Background: Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) is an important opportunistic pathogen that can easily cause pneumonia and pleural effusion when body resistance is reduced. However, the positive rate of KP detected from clinical pleural effusion by traditional methods, including bacterial culture, is meager. Therefore, new detection methods are urgently needed to improve the positive detection rate of KP and other bacteria in pleural effusion.

Methods: Simulated pleural fluid of KP infection was first set up. Then circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted from cultured hydrothorax and detected by fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to verify KP cfDNA in the pleural fluid. The specificity, sensitivity, and repeatability of this method are verified by detecting the cfDNAs in pleural effusion, samples of malignant pleural effusion, tuberculous pleural effusion, and other common microbial infections. Finally, this method was compared with three traditional methods, pleural effusion, precipitation DNA, sputum culture, and pleural effusion culture to explore the clinical diagnostic value of this method.

Results: KP cfDNA was positive by fluorescence PCR from the simulated KP infected pleural effusion, which confirmed KP cfDNA in pleural effusion. KP cfDNA was positive by fluorescence PCR from the pleural effusion of KP infected patients, while with the same detection method, KP cfDNA in clinical carcinomatous hydrothorax, tuberculosis hydrothorax, and other standard microbial infection samples was negative, which confirmed the method had high specificity, high sensitivity, and reproducibility. Compared with the three traditional methods, this method has a higher positive rate. Compared with the gold standard, sputum bacterial culture, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this method were 91.67%, 95.45%, 91.7%, and 95.5%, respectively.

Conclusions: The detection of cfDNA by fluorescence PCR is possible. Moreover, the positive rate of this method in clinical pleural effusions is high.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/apm-20-1574DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pleural effusion
40
pleural
15
cfdna pleural
12
pleural fluid
12
positive rate
12
traditional methods
12
fluorescence pcr
12
effusion
10
klebsiella pneumoniae
8
cfdna
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!