A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

2010 French SPILF-AFSSAPS guiding criteria for Streptococcuspneumoniae acute community-acquired pneumonia: Evaluation in patients of the PACSCAN-ESCAPED cohort. | LitMetric

2010 French SPILF-AFSSAPS guiding criteria for Streptococcuspneumoniae acute community-acquired pneumonia: Evaluation in patients of the PACSCAN-ESCAPED cohort.

Infect Dis Now

Inserm CIC-1425, hôpital universitaire Bichat, AP-HP, Paris, France; Inserm UMR-1137 IAME, UFR de Médecine-Bichat, université Paris Diderot, Paris 7, Paris, France. Electronic address:

Published: March 2021

Objective: To assess the proportion of patients meeting the 2010 SPILF-AFSSAPS guiding criteria for Streptococcuspneumoniae in patients consulting at the emergency departments of four French university hospitals for acute community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) suspicion.

Patients And Methods: The PACSCAN study prospectively included 319 patients. Medical history, clinical, biological, and radiological presentations were collected. An adjudication committee retrospectively classified the diagnostic certainty based on the initial chest CT scan data and the follow-up data up to Day 28. S. pneumoniae was looked for according to the clinician's choice of blood culture, pneumococcal urinary antigen test, nasopharyngeal PCR, and/or sputum microbiological examination.

Results: All patients (100%) met at least one criterion for S. pneumoniae CAP and six (2%) met all criteria. The distribution of criteria ranged from 32% (chest pain criterion) to 86% (age≥40years criterion). These figures were respectively 100%, 3%, 38%, and 82% when the study population was restricted to the 139 patients with definite or probable CAP, according to the adjudication committee. Taking into account the microbiological results, the criteria taken one by one or combined did not make it possible to differentiate the 19 S. pneumoniae CAP from the other CAPs.

Conclusion: The 2010 SPILF-AFSSAPS guiding criteria for S. pneumoniae CAP are found in very variable proportions and do not, in their current form, make it possible to accurately guide towards a pneumococcal etiology in patients included in the PACSCAN study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2020.09.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spilf-afssaps guiding
12
guiding criteria
12
s pneumoniae cap
12
criteria streptococcuspneumoniae
8
acute community-acquired
8
community-acquired pneumonia
8
2010 spilf-afssaps
8
pacscan study
8
adjudication committee
8
patients
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!