Purpose: To understand the validity of differential ratings of perceived exertion (dRPE) as a measure of girls' training and match internal loads.
Methods: Using the centiMax scale (CR100), session dRPE for breathlessness (sRPE-B) and leg muscle exertion (sRPE-L) were collected across a season of training (soccer, resistance, and fitness) and matches from 33 players (15 [1] y). Differences and associations between dRPE were examined using mixed and general linear models. The authors' minimal practical important difference was 8 arbitrary units (AU).
Results: Mean (AU [SD] ∼16) sRPE-B and sRPE-L were 66 and 61 for matches, 51 and 49 for soccer, 86 and 67 for fitness, and 45 and 58 for resistance, respectively. Session RPE-B was rated most likely harder than sRPE-L for fitness (19 AU; 90% confidence limits: ±7) and most likely easier for resistance (-13; ±2). Match (5; ±4) and soccer (-3; ±2) differences were likely to most likely trivial. The within-player relationships between sRPE-B and sRPE-L were very likely moderate for matches (r = .44; 90% confidence limits: ±.12) and resistance training (.38; ±.06), likely large for fitness training (.51; ±.22), and most likely large for soccer training (.56; ±.03). Shared variance ranged from 14% to 35%.
Conclusions: Practically meaningful differences between dRPE following physical training sessions coupled with low shared variance in all training types and matches suggest that sRPE-B and sRPE-L represent unique sensory inputs in girls' soccer players. The data provide evidence for the face and construct validity of dRPE as a measure of internal load in this population.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2019-0595 | DOI Listing |
Int J Sports Physiol Perform
October 2020
Purpose: To understand the validity of differential ratings of perceived exertion (dRPE) as a measure of girls' training and match internal loads.
Methods: Using the centiMax scale (CR100), session dRPE for breathlessness (sRPE-B) and leg muscle exertion (sRPE-L) were collected across a season of training (soccer, resistance, and fitness) and matches from 33 players (15 [1] y). Differences and associations between dRPE were examined using mixed and general linear models.
J Sports Sci
November 2018
a Department of Psychology, Sport and Exercise, School of Social Sciences , Humanities and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough , UK.
We aimed to compare differentiated training loads (TL) between fitness responders and non-responders to an eight-week pre-season training period in a squad of thirty-five professional rugby union players. Differential TL were calculated by multiplying player's perceptions of breathlessness (sRPE-B) and leg muscle exertion (sRPE-L) with training duration for each completed session. Performance-based fitness measures included the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 (YYIRTL1), 10-, 20-, and 30-m linear sprint times, countermovement jump height (CMJ) and predicted one-repetition maximum back squat (P1RM Squat).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Sci Med Sport
March 2017
Sport & Exercise Subject Group, School of Social Sciences, Business and Law, Teesside University, UK.
Objectives: To investigate the application of differential ratings of perceived exertion (dRPE) to team-sport training.
Design: Single cohort, observational study.
Methods: Twenty-nine professional rugby union players were monitored over a six-week intensified training period.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!