A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability. | LitMetric

Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability.

J Clin Med

Department of Prosthodontics, Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse 100, 66421 Homburg, Germany.

Published: September 2020

Insertion energy has been advocated as a novel measure for primary implant stability, but the effect of implant length, diameter, or surgical protocol remains unclear. Twenty implants from one specific bone level implant system were placed in layered polyurethane foam measuring maximum insertion torque, torque-time curves, and primary stability using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Insertion energy was calculated as area under torque-time curve applying the trapezoidal formula. Statistical analysis was based on analysis of variance, Tukey honest differences tests and Pearson's product moment correlation tests (α = 0.05). Implant stability ( = 0.01) and insertion energy ( < 0.01) differed significantly among groups, while maximum insertion torque did not ( = 0.17). Short implants showed a significant decrease in implant stability ( = 0.01), while reducing implant diameter did not cause any significant effect. Applying the drilling protocol for dense bone resulted in significantly increased insertion energy ( = 0.02) but a significant decrease in implant stability ( = 0.04). Insertion energy was not found to be a more reliable parameter for evaluating primary implant stability when compared to maximum insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565125PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092977DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

insertion energy
24
implant stability
24
maximum insertion
12
insertion torque
12
implant
9
insertion
8
primary implant
8
resonance frequency
8
frequency analysis
8
stability 001
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!