Interprofessional simulation effects for healthcare students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nurse Educ Today

Nursing School, Centro Universitário Euro-Americano, Brasilia and Post Graduation Program in Health Science and Technology, University of Brasilia, Brazil.; Faculty of Health Science and Post-graduation Program in Health Science and Technology, University of Brasilia, Brazil.. Electronic address:

Published: November 2020

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of studies describing the effects of interprofessional education (IPE) on collaborative competence using simulated-based training of undergraduate healthcare students.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on PRISMA guidelines.

Data Sources: PubMed and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were searched to identify articles in all languages published up to 2018. The systematic review protocol was registered at PROSPERO under number 133330.

Review Methods: In total, 419 articles were identified. The following articles were excluded: non-English articles, articles for which the full text was not available, articles that did not employ a validated tool, articles that did not use quasi-experimental methods and that did not assess healthcare student populations. Eleven studies were included, and 6 were submitted to meta-analysis using forest plots through RevMan 5.3.

Results: Interprofessional simulation analysis yielded results regarding participants, protocols, scenarios, validated tools, collaborative competencies and primary outcomes. The meta-analysis was organized based on assessment tool, and summary value, confidence interval, and Z test results for the random-effects model are presented.

Conclusion: Quantitative analysis reveals a positive impact and the effectiveness of interprofessional simulation. However, more research should be conducted utilizing clinical trials with distinguished analyses for each collaborative competency factor to assess long-term effects on the outcome.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104568DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systematic review
16
interprofessional simulation
12
review meta-analysis
8
articles
7
interprofessional
4
simulation effects
4
effects healthcare
4
healthcare students
4
systematic
4
students systematic
4

Similar Publications

Chemsex is a specific practice of sexualized drug use (SDU), linked mainly to the group of men who have sex with men (MSM). This practice has become a public health problem due to the increase in sexually transmitted infections and HIV. However, there are groups and aspects that require greater visibility and research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the accuracy and success rate of ultrasound in determining fetal sex. A search was conducted on Medline, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases, and the reference lists of selected studies were also reviewed. Meta-analyses were performed using Revman 5.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Locally advanced colorectal tumors frequently invade adjacent organs, particularly the urinary bladder in the sigmoid colon and upper rectum, complicating multivisceral resections. This study compared postoperative outcomes of partial cystectomy (PC) and total cystectomy (TC) in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Central Register of Clinical Trials, and Web of Science for studies published up to November 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Perioperative respiratory adverse event (PRAE) is one of the most common complications in pediatric anesthesia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative pharmacological interventions to prevent the development of PRAE in children undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Forecasting future public pharmaceutical expenditure is a challenge for healthcare payers, particularly owing to the unpredictability of new market introductions and their economic impact. No best-practice forecasting methods have been established so far. The literature distinguishes between the top-down approach, based on historical trends, and the bottom-up approach, using a combination of historical and horizon scanning data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!