PCI to improve survival is currently recommended as a reasonable alternative to CABG in patients with unprotected left main disease. However, RCTs to support this recommendation has generated mixed results and recently published EXCEL trial has sparked debate about differences in late mortality. To address this point, we performed landmark meta-analysis of 4 RCTs with 5 year follow up data - EXCEL, NOBLE, PRECOMBAT and SYNTAX LEFT MAIN. Overall, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between PCI and CABG at 5 years (RR = 1.03 [95% CI = 0.79-1.33]). However, there was apparent change in the direction of association before and after the 1 year landmark that underscores the need for long term follow up in these trials. In addition, we found that PCI was associated with significantly lower rate of intermediate stroke at 1 year (RR = 0.44 [0.24-0.82]) but higher rate of late MI after 1 year (3.31 [2.11-5.18]) compared to CABG.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2020.08.040DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

left main
12
pci cabg
8
main disease
8
landmark meta-analysis
8
intermediate late
4
late outcomes
4
pci
4
outcomes pci
4
cabg
4
cabg left
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!