Heterogeneity of Outcome Measures Used in Randomized Controlled Trials for the Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus: A Methodological Study.

J Evid Based Dent Pract

The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Department of Oral Medicine, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. Electronic address:

Published: September 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory immune disease that can potentially lead to cancer, but there is debate over how to standardize its treatment due to varying outcomes in clinical trials.
  • A study reviewed 88 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2004 and 2018, identifying a wide range of outcome measures to evaluate OLP treatments, with the majority focusing on clinical symptoms and scores.
  • The findings highlighted significant variability in the measures used, suggesting a need for a standardized set of outcome measures in future research to allow for better comparisons across trials.

Article Abstract

Objective: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory immune disease, recognized as an oral potentially malignant disorder by the World Health Organization. There is considerable controversy over the standardized treatment of OLP, with great diversities in the outcome measures in clinical trials. This methodological study aimed to estimate the degree of consensus on outcome measures in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for OLP treatment.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify RCTs published from 2004 to 2018 about OLP treatment. All the outcome measures and measurement methods mentioned in the trials were extracted and analyzed.

Results: After identification of 1087 articles, 88 RCTs were included. A total of 193 single-outcome measures and 119 composite outcome measures were classified into 11 different domains, the chief of which consisted of clinical symptom (78 trials; 88.6%) and clinical score (58 trials; 65.9%). Visual analog scale (65 trials; 73.9%) and Thongprasom scoring system (38 trials; 43.2%) were the predominant measurement methods. Oral health-related quality of life (except for clinical symptoms) accounted for 4.8% of all the outcome measures.

Conclusions: There was high heterogeneity in outcome measures of RCTs for OLP treatment, making it difficult to make valid comparisons between different clinical trials. A core outcome set should be developed and adopted in future trials for OLP treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101468DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

outcome measures
24
olp treatment
12
trials
10
heterogeneity outcome
8
measures randomized
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trials
8
oral lichen
8
lichen planus
8
methodological study
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!