Outcomes of sleeve lobectomy versus pneumonectomy: A propensity score-matched study.

Objectives: To compare short- and long-term outcomes between sleeve lobectomy and pneumonectomy for lung cancer in a single center during a 15-year period.

Methods: One thousand nine hundred eighty-one patients who underwent either a sleeve lobectomy (n = 964; 48.7%) or a pneumonectomy (n = 1017; 51.3%) from January 2003 to December 2017 at the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, were matched according to a propensity score to produce 2 groups of 665 patients each. The study period was divided into 3 5-year subperiods.

Results: Sleeve lobectomy was associated with a lower 30- and 90-day mortality (0.60% and 0.90% vs 1.5% and 3.91%; P = .177 and P = .001, respectively, after matching), lower morbidity (4.36% vs 8.16%; P = .005 before matching, 3.61% vs 8.72%; P < .001 after matching), improved 5-year survival (62.7% vs 43.1%; P < .001 before matching and 61% vs 44.7%; P < .001 after matching), and 5-year disease-free survival after matching (56.6% vs 46.2%; P < .001). The sleeve lobectomy to pneumonectomy ratio increased by 78%, whereas 90-day mortality decreased by 66.81% between the first and the last subperiods.

Conclusions: Sleeve lobectomy is associated with improved short- and long-term outcomes and should be the resection of choice for centrally located lung cancers, when feasible.