AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the impact of vitamin D supplementation on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure over a 6-year period, following the EVITA trial where 4000 IU of vitamin D was administered daily.
  • Results show no significant difference in overall mortality between the vitamin D group and the placebo group, with hazard ratios for mortality remaining close to 1 during both active and post-intervention phases.
  • Hospitalization and need for mechanical support were higher during vitamin D supplementation, but these differences were not significant after the supplementation ended, indicating a lack of long-term benefits from vitamin D in this context.

Article Abstract

Aims: Vitamin D supplementation is widely used in the clinical setting, but its effects on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure are unclear. This paper reports outcome data that were collected during follow-up of 3 years after closure of the EVITA trial (a 3 year randomized, placebo-controlled, intervention study with 4000 IU vitamin D daily in patients with advanced heart failure), to capture potential latency effects of vitamin D supplementation on clinical outcomes.

Methods And Results: The prespecified primary endpoint was overall mortality. Secondary endpoints included hospitalization, mechanical circulatory support implantation, high urgent listing for heart transplantation, and heart transplantation. For group comparisons, we used Cox regression models with a time-dependent categorical covariate. The calculated net difference in circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D between the vitamin D and placebo groups dropped from 60.9 nmol/L at the end of the active study period to 3.2 nmol/L at the end of the post-intervention period. During the entire 6 year period, 73 patients (36.5%) died in the placebo group and 76 (38.8%) in the vitamin D group. Out of these 149 patients, 36 and 39 died during the first 3 years, and 37 and 37 during the second 3 years, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) for mortality in the vitamin D versus the placebo group was 1.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-1.66] for the first 3 years and 1.07 (95% CI: 0.68-1.70) for the 3 year post-intervention follow-up. Compared with the placebo group, the HRs for hospitalization and for mechanical circulatory support implant were significantly higher in the vitamin D group during vitamin D supplementation (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.68 and HR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.08-3.76, respectively) but not after vitamin D discontinuation (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.62-1.94 and HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.38-2.56, respectively). There was no significant time-dependent effect on the risk of high urgent listing for heart transplantation and heart transplantation.

Conclusions: No beneficial latency effects of vitamin D supplementation on overall mortality could be demonstrated. Instead, the disappearance of unfavourable findings in the vitamin D group (higher HRs for hospitalization and for mechanical circulatory support implant) after vitamin D discontinuation supports the assumption of adverse vitamin D effects on the cardiovascular system at doses of 4000 IU daily.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755020PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12953DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vitamin supplementation
20
vitamin
14
heart failure
12
hospitalization mechanical
12
mechanical circulatory
12
circulatory support
12
heart transplantation
12
placebo group
12
vitamin group
12
3 year post-intervention
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!