Validation of a Prediction Score for Drug-Resistant Microorganisms in Community-acquired Pneumonia.

Ann Am Thorac Soc

Centro de Investigacíon Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CB06/06/0028), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Published: February 2021

Recommended initial empiric antimicrobial treatment covers the most common bacterial pathogens; however, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) may be caused by microorganisms not targeted by this treatment. Developed in 2015, the PES (, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing , and methicillin-resistant ) score was developed in 2015 to predict the microbiological etiology of CAP caused by PES microorganisms. To validate the usefulness of the PES score for predicting PES microorganisms in two cohorts of patients with CAP from Valencia and Mataró. We analyzed two prospective observational cohorts of patients with CAP from Valencia and Mataró. Patients in the Mataró cohort were all admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). Of the 1,024 patients in the Valencia cohort, 505 (51%) had a microbiological etiology and 31 (6%) had a PES microorganism isolated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.74-0.88). For a PES score ≥5, sensitivity, specificity, the negative and positive predictive values as well as the negative and positive likelihood ratios were 72%, 74%, 98%, 14%, 0.38, and 2.75, respectively. Of the 299 patients in the Mataró cohort, 213 (71%) had a microbiological etiology and 11 (5%) had a PES microorganism isolated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.73 (95% CI 0.61-0.86). For a PES score ≥ 5, sensitivity, specificity, the negative and positive predictive values, and the negative and positive likelihood ratios were 36%, 83%, 96%, 11%, 0.77, and 2.09, respectively. The best cutoff for patients admitted to the ICU was 4 points, which improved sensitivity to 86%. The hypothetical application of the PES score showed high rates of overtreatment in both cohorts (26% and 35%, respectively) and similar rates of undertreatment. The PES score showed good accuracy in predicting the risk for microorganisms that required different empirical therapy; however, its use as a single strategy for detecting noncore pathogens could lead to high rates of overtreatment. Given its high negative predictive value, the PES score may be used as a first step of a wider strategy that includes subsequent advanced diagnostic tests.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202005-558OCDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pes score
20
negative positive
16
microbiological etiology
12
pes
11
community-acquired pneumonia
8
cap caused
8
developed 2015
8
pes microorganisms
8
cohorts patients
8
patients cap
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!