Background: Head-to-head comparison of BeadChip and WGS/WES genotyping techniques for their precision is far from straightforward. A tool for validation of high-throughput genotyping calls such as Sanger sequencing is neither scalable nor practical for large-scale DNA processing. Here we report a cross-validation analysis of genotyping calls obtained via Illumina GSA BeadChip and WGS (Illumina HiSeq X Ten) techniques.
Results: When compared to each other, the average precision and accuracy of BeadChip and WGS genotyping techniques exceeded 0.991 and 0.997, respectively. The average fraction of discordant variants for both platforms was found to be 0.639%. A sliding window approach was utilized to explore genomic regions not exceeding 500 bp encompassing a maximal amount of discordant variants for further validation by Sanger sequencing. Notably, 12 variants out of 26 located within eight identified regions were consistently discordant in related calls made by WGS and BeadChip. When Sanger sequenced, a total of 16 of these genotypes were successfully resolved, indicating that a precision of WGS and BeadChip genotyping for this genotype subset was at 0.81 and 0.5, respectively, with accuracy values of 0.87 and 0.61.
Conclusions: We conclude that WGS genotype calling exhibits higher overall precision within the selected variety of discordantly genotyped variants, though the amount of validated variants remained insufficient.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488117 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06919-x | DOI Listing |
Inflamm Bowel Dis
December 2024
Department of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Complex Genetics Leuven, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 604, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are polygenic, with many genetic variants contributing to disease risk. Knowing the genotype of specific variants or calculating a combined genetic risk score benefits translational and functional research. To address this, we developed MIP4IBD, a flexible and cost-effective genotyping-by-sequencing assay using molecular inversion probes (MIPs).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOphthalmol Retina
November 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Forensic Sci Int
November 2024
Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Victoria, Australia; Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address:
The successful application of Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG) to the identification of unidentified human remains and perpetrators of serious crime has led to a growing interest in its use internationally, including Australia. Routinely, FIGG has relied on the generation of high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiles from forensic samples using whole genome array (WGA) (∼650,000 or more SNPs) or whole genome sequencing (WGS) (millions of SNPs) for DNA segment-based comparisons in commercially available genealogy databases. To date, this approach has required DNA of a quality and quantity that is often not compatible with forensic samples.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGenes (Basel)
February 2024
Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
BMC Genomics
January 2024
Hi-Tech Center and Vinmec-VinUni Institute of Immunology, Vinmec Healthcare System, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!