A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An Study. | LitMetric

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An Study.

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, DJ College of Dental Sciences and Research, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Published: January 2020

Aim: The study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of various placement techniques of composite restoration on microleakage.

Materials And Methods: Forty extracted premolars were selected and a rectangular-shaped cavity was prepared on the buccal surface of cervical third of each tooth. Thereafter, teeth were randomly divided into four groups equally and were restored with the composite restorative material with different placement techniques, i.e., bulk placement technique, horizontal incremental technique, split incremental technique, and newly introduced Mat incremental technique. Samples were thermocycled and immersed in methylene blue dye for 24 hours. The samples were then sectioned and evaluated under a stereomicroscope for microleakage.

Results: Microleakage was present least in the Mat incremental group and maximum in the bulk placement group while intercomparison revealed statistically significant difference between all the groups except for split incremental and Mat incremental groups.

Conclusion: The recently introduced Mat incremental placement technique showed least microleakage when compared to conventional techniques.

How To Cite This Article: Somani R, Som NK, Jaidka S, Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Various Placement Techniques of Composite Restoration: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(3):264-268.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7450201PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1764DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

placement techniques
16
mat incremental
16
techniques composite
12
composite restoration
12
incremental technique
12
comparative evaluation
8
evaluation microleakage
8
microleakage placement
8
restoration study
8
bulk placement
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!