Background: Continued advances in endovascular technologies are resulting in fewer open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs. In addition, more complex juxtarenal, pararenal, and suprarenal (JPS) AAAs are being managed with various endovascular techniques. This study sought to evaluate the evolving trends in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of AAAs, hypothesizing increased rate of JPS AAA repair by EVAR. We also sought to evaluate the risk for morbidity and mortality for EVAR and open aneurysm repair (OAR) of JPS AAAs over time.
Methods: The 2011-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Procedure-Targeted Vascular database was queried for patients undergoing OAR or EVAR for AAAs. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for both infrarenal and JPS AAA repairs.
Results: Of 18,661 patients who underwent AAA repair, 3,941 (21.1%) were OAR and 14,720 (78.9%) were EVAR. The rate of OAR decreased from 29.5% in 2011 to 21.3% in 2017 (P < 0.001) with a geometric-mean-annual decrease of 27.8%. The rate of EVAR increased from 70.5% to 78.7% during the same time period (P < 0.001) with a geometric-mean-annual increase of 11.6%. These trends remained true for both infrarenal and JPS AAAs. After adjusting for covariates, there was no difference in associated risk of 30-day mortality, renal complications, or ischemic colitis for either OAR or EVAR over each incremental year for infrarenal AAAs (P > 0.05). However, in patients undergoing EVAR for JPS AAAs, the associated risk of mortality increased with each incremental year (odds ratio [OR]: 1.30, confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.69, P = 0.039), whereas there was no difference in the risk of mortality for OAR of JPS AAAs with each incremental year (OR: 1.11, CI: 0.99-1.23, P = 0.067).
Conclusions: The rate of OAR for AAA has decreased over the past seven years with an increase in EVAR, particularly for more complex JPS AAAs. The associated risk for morbidity and mortality for treatment of infrarenal AAAs was not significantly affected by this increased utility of EVAR. The associated risk of mortality for JPS AAAs treated by EVAR increased over time, whereas this trend for associated risk of mortality was not seen for OAR of JPS AAAs. These findings, especially the increased associated risk of mortality over time with EVAR for JPS AAAs, warrant careful prospective analysis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.103 | DOI Listing |
J Endovasc Ther
January 2025
Department of Vascular Surgery, Swiss Aortic Center Bern, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of Anaconda fenestrated endograft for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA).
Material And Methods: A systematic search of all the literature reported until May 2024 was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The pooled 30-day mortality rate, technical success rate, reintervention rate as well as bridging stent occlusion rate, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed or random effect methods.
Int J Surg Case Rep
January 2025
Jinka University, department of statistics, Jinka, Ethiopia.
Introduction And Importance: Traumatic injuries of the inferior Vena Cava (IVC) are rare among traumatic abdominal injuries. It accounts for fewer than 5 % of penetrating injuries and 0.5 % of blunt trauma injuries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Endovasc Ther
September 2024
Vascular Surgery Department, Hopital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.
Purpose: This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the fenestrated Anaconda device for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms over 1 year in daily clinical practice.
Materials And Methods: All patients who received the graft between October 2019 and October 2020 were prospectively enrolled in an observational, multicenter national registry. The primary endpoint was the aneurysm-related 1-year mortality rate.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak
September 2024
Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (f-EVAR, b-EVAR, respectively) are technically challenging procedures that have evolved over the last decade for complex aortic aneurysms. They are alternatives to surgical repair for suprarenal and juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. A Pubmed database was reviewed by searching keywords related to f-EVAR, b-EVAR, and juxta renal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) from the last five years to see current indications, contemporary techniques, and results of these techniques for juxtarenal aneurysms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVasc Endovascular Surg
November 2024
Department of Surgery, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been identified as an independent predictor of poorer long-term prognosis after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). However, its impact on short-term perioperative outcomes is conflicting, which can be important for preoperative risk stratification. This study aimed to evaluate the 30-day outcomes of patients with CKD following non-ruptured complex EVAR in a national registry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!