AI Article Synopsis

  • Cisplatin-induced hearing loss is a significant issue for childhood cancer survivors, prompting the need for effective otoprotection strategies among healthcare providers.
  • The Children's Oncology Group conducted a survey to gather insights from various providers regarding the use of sodium thiosulfate for otoprotection, audiometry practices in cystplatin therapy, and preferred research methods.
  • Although awareness of the importance of otoprotection is high, adoption of STS as standard care is limited, and there is a strong preference for systemic approaches in future otoprotection research.

Article Abstract

Background: Cisplatin-induced hearing loss (CIHL) is a common and debilitating toxicity for childhood cancer survivors. Understanding provider perspectives is crucial to developing otoprotection studies that are both informative and feasible. Two international trials (ACCL0431 and SIOPEL6) investigated the drug sodium thiosulfate (STS) as an otoprotectant, but definitive interpretation of the findings of these trials has been challenging. Adoption of STS has therefore been uneven, and provider perspectives on its role are unknown.

Procedure: The Children's Oncology Group (COG) Cancer Control and Supportive Care Neurotoxicity Subcommittee therefore conducted a survey of providers at COG institutions to determine perspectives on pediatric otoprotection practices and research surrounding three major themes: (1) prevalence of routine use of STS with cisplatin-based regimens, (2) application of audiometry to cisplatin therapy, and (3) preferred modalities for otoprotection research.

Results: Survey respondents (45%, 44/98 surveyed institutions) were of diverse institutional sizes, practice settings, and geographical locations primarily in the United States and Canada. Overall, respondents considered CIHL an important toxicity and indicated strong enthusiasm for future studies (98%, 40/41). Results indicated that while STS was the current or planned standard of care in a minority of responding institutions (36%, 16/44), most sites were receptive to its inclusion in appropriate study designs. Application of audiometry for ototoxicity monitoring varied widely across sites. For otoprotection research, systemic agents were preferred (68%, 28/41) as compared with intratympanic approaches.

Conclusion: These results suggest that pediatric otoprotection trials remain of interest to providers; the emphasis of these trials should remain on systemic and not intratympanic therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808411PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pbc.28647DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

provider perspectives
12
children's oncology
8
oncology group
8
cancer control
8
control supportive
8
supportive care
8
pediatric otoprotection
8
application audiometry
8
trials remain
8
otoprotection
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!