Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the short-, mid-, and long-term results of pyrocarbon PIPJ arthroplasty.

Materials And Methods: Twenty-seven consecutive patients (9 males, 18 females) had arthroplasty for 32 pyrocarbon PIPJ prostheses. Two patients (two joints) were lost for follow-up. Four implants were removed during follow-up. Fifteen patients (18 implants) were available for a long-term follow-up assessment on average 9.7 (9-10.8) years postoperatively and seven patients with eight implants had telephone interviews to calculate the implant survival and complications. Of the 15 patients who came to the latest follow-up, 12 (14 implants) passed each of the three follow-up visits for short-term (ø 19 months), mid-term (ø 54 months), and long-term follow-up (ø 9.8 years) to compare functional and radiological parameters longitudinally.

Results: In total, seven of the 30 joints (23%) required a revision surgery, all within the first 2 years postoperatively, including three arthrodesis due to early infection or dislocation, and one distal component removal due to primary loosening. Three patients required soft tissue revisions. The implant survival after 9 years was 87%. There was minimal pain at rest throughout the 9-year follow-up analysis; pain with activity was rated 1.9 at the short-term assessment, 1.5 at mid-term, and 1.6 at long-term. The average active range of motion was at short-, mid-, and long-term examination 49°, 50°, and 48° and grip strength averaged 24, 24, and 21 kg, respectively. The DASH score was stable with 35, 36, and 33 points. At the long-term follow-up, all evaluated implants showed radiological signs of implant loosening or migration. According to the PIP joint outcome score, 57% resulted finally in a "good" outcome.

Conclusions: Pyrocarbon PIPJ arthroplasty has a risk of early complications necessitating revision surgeries. In spite of radiological implant migration, good pain relief, grip strength, and high quality-of-life ratings are stable for a long time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03592-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pyrocarbon pipj
12
long-term follow-up
12
follow-up
9
implants long-term
8
short- mid-
8
mid- long-term
8
follow-up implants
8
patients implants
8
implant survival
8
grip strength
8

Similar Publications

Outcomes of Small Joint Arthroplasty for the Rheumatoid Hand.

Hand Clin

February 2025

Upper Limb Unit, Wrightington Hospital, Hall Lane, Appley Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire, WN6 9EP, UK.

The number of patients presenting to the hand surgeon with severe rheumatoid disease has decreased with the introduction of more effective medical management. However some rheumatoid patients will undergo disease progression despite this. MCPJ and PIPJ replacement can be effective surgical treatments in these patients but patient selection is crucial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Arthroplasty of the small joints of the hand and fingers is a complex problem facing the hand surgeon. Pyrocarbon implants have been available for several decades. They were originally thought to provide better functional outcomes than silicone implants in patients, mostly due to recreation of the joint anatomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pyrolytic Carbon Hemiarthroplasty for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthritis, Long-Term Follow-Up.

J Hand Surg Am

February 2024

Department of Orthopedics and Hand Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. Electronic address:

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term clinical, subjective, and radiographic results of pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthritis at a single institution.

Methods: Patients treated with a pyrolytic carbon hemiarthroplasty between 2005 and 2015 were contacted for a clinical follow-up visit. Patients were assessed before surgery, one year after surgery, and again after a mean of 11 years (range: 6-16 years).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: There is a lack of scientific consensus on the best arthroplasty implant option for proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthritis, due to diversity in outcome reporting and measurement methods. The development of a standardized core outcome set (COS) and standard outcome measures could mitigate this issue. This study catalogs the reported outcomes and outcome measures found in PIPJ arthroplasty studies, which can be used in the first step of developing a COS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Outcome of proximal interphalangeal joint replacement with pyrocarbon implants: a long-term longitudinal follow-up study.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

November 2020

Clinic for Hand Surgery, Rhön Medical Center, Campus Bad Neustadt, Von Guttenberg-Straße 11, 97616, Bad Neustadt/Saale, Germany.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the short-, mid-, and long-term results of pyrocarbon PIPJ arthroplasty.

Materials And Methods: Twenty-seven consecutive patients (9 males, 18 females) had arthroplasty for 32 pyrocarbon PIPJ prostheses. Two patients (two joints) were lost for follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!