A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Dual target search: Attention tuned to relative features, both within and across feature dimensions. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Current models suggest that attention can be directed intentionally to find specific target features, like color or shape.
  • Research indicates that attention is often more influenced by context, focusing on the differences between the target and surrounding distractions.
  • This study shows that when searching for multiple targets, attention is effectively biased toward the relative features of those targets, supporting the idea that relational processing applies in dual target search scenarios.

Article Abstract

Current models of attention propose that we can tune attention in a top-down controlled manner to a (e.g., shape, color) to find specific items (e.g., a red car; ). However, subsequent research has shown that attention is often tuned in a context-dependent manner to the that distinguish a sought-after target from other surrounding nontarget items (e.g., larger, bluer, and faster; ). Currently, it is unknown whether search will be feature-specific or relational in search for multiple targets with different attributes. In the present study, observers had to search for 2 targets that differed either across 2 stimulus dimensions (color, motion; Experiment 1) or within the same stimulus dimension (color; Experiment 2: orange/redder or aqua/bluer). We distinguished between feature-specific and relational search by measuring eye movements to different types of irrelevant distractors (e.g., relatively matching vs. feature-matching). The results showed that attention was biased to the 2 relative features of the targets, both across different feature dimensions (i.e., motion and color) and within a single dimension (i.e., 2 colors; bluer and redder). The results were not due to automatic intertrial effects (dimension weighting or feature priming), and we found only small effects for valid precueing of the target feature, indicating that relational search for two targets was conducted with relative ease. This is the first demonstration that attention is top-down biased to the relative target features in dual target search, which shows that the relational account generalizes to multiple target search. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000851DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

target search
12
relational search
12
dual target
8
search
8
attention tuned
8
relative features
8
feature dimensions
8
attention top-down
8
feature-specific relational
8
search targets
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!