Clinical utility of combined T2-weighted imaging and T2-mapping in the detection of prostate cancer: a multi-observer study.

Quant Imaging Med Surg

Department of Radiology, Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.

Published: September 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • Researchers studied the effectiveness of combining T2-weighted imaging with T2-mapping in detecting prostate cancer in 40 patients, comparing this method to standard T2-weighted imaging.
  • They found that while there was only a slight improvement in reader agreement and overall diagnostic accuracy, the combination method significantly increased sensitivity for detecting malignancy from 49.2% to 73.0%.
  • Despite the higher sensitivity, the combined method produced slightly lower specificity, meaning it could lead to more false positives, but both techniques had comparable predictive values for diagnosing prostate cancer.

Article Abstract

Background: To evaluate the clinical utility of combined T2-weighted imaging and T2-mapping for the detection of prostate cancer.

Methods: Forty patients underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and T2-mapping of the prostate. Three readers each reviewed two sets of images: T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) sequence (standard T2), and standard T2 in combination with T2-mapping. Each reader assigned probability scores for malignancy to each zone [peripheral zone (PZ) or transition zone (TZ)]. Inter-observer variability for standard T2 and combined standard T2 with T2-mapping were assessed. Diagnostic accuracy was compared between standard T2 and combined standard T2 with T2-mapping.

Results: There was fair agreement between all three readers for standard T2 [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) =0.56] and combined standard T2 with T2-mapping (ICC =0.58). There was no significant difference in the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve for standard T2 compared to combined standard T2 with T2-mapping (0.89 0.82, P=0.31). Sensitivity (Sn) for combined standard T2 with T2-mapping was significantly higher compared to standard T2 alone (73.0% 49.2%, P=0.006). Specificity (Sp) for combined standard T2 with T2-mapping was borderline significantly lower compared to standard T2 alone (89.3% 94.9%, P=0.05). There was no significant differences between the negative predictive values (NPVs) and positive predictive values (PPVs) (P=0.07, P=0.45).

Conclusions: Combination of T2-weighted imaging and T2-mapping could potentially increase Sn for prostate malignancy compared to T2-weighted imaging alone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417765PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-222DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

combined standard
24
standard t2-mapping
20
t2-weighted imaging
16
standard
14
imaging t2-mapping
12
compared standard
12
t2-mapping
10
clinical utility
8
combined
8
utility combined
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!