A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Does sedation influence cardiac magnetic resonance duration for children? | LitMetric

Purpose: The aims of our study were to compare cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scan time (time elapsed between first and last acquired sequence) and room time (time elapsed between patients' entrance and exit of the MRI room) between sedated and non-sedated children and to assess the contributing factors.

Methods: It is a cohort study performed at a CMR facility in a tertiary-care center. We compared scan time and room time between sedated and non-sedated children and assessed the influence of gender, age, weight, height, body surface area, number of sequences, and patients' diagnosis/previous procedures.

Results: We included 140 children (74 sedated and 66 non-sedated), age 7.6 years (3-12) and body surface area 0.83 m (0.57-1.25). The most common diagnosis/previous procedures were repaired tetralogy of Fallot, cardiomyopathies and single ventricle. Number of sequences: 18 (16-22). Scan time: 42 min (35-54.2); room time: 53 min (46-63). There was difference in room time between sedated and non-sedated children (57.6 ± 13.6 vs 52.2 ± 15 min, p < 0.05), but not in scan time (47.2 ± 14.1 vs 43.9 ± 16 min, p 0.2). The only factor associated with scan time was the number of sequences (r 0.75, p < 0.001). The only factor associated with room time was single ventricle as indication (r 0.26, p 0.007).

Conclusions: Sedated children spent 5 more minutes in the CMR room than non-sedated children. Single ventricle was associated with increased room time. Number of sequences correlated with scan time. Sedation did not influence these times.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.08.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

room time
16
sedated non-sedated
16
scan time
12
non-sedated children
12
time
9
cardiac magnetic
8
magnetic resonance
8
time time
8
time elapsed
8
time sedated
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!