A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Revisiting nutrition backlash: Psychometric properties and discriminant validity of the nutrition backlash scale. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates "nutrition backlash," which refers to negative feelings about dietary guidelines, and its impact on fruit and vegetable consumption.
  • The research involved two studies with a total of 879 adults, discovering a reliable six-item scale for measuring nutrition backlash that differs from other negative feelings like overload and worry.
  • Findings showed higher backlash among less-educated, non-white, and male participants, and those with increased backlash tended to ignore nutritional labels and protective health behaviors like sunscreen use.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Nutrition backlash is a disposition defined by negative feelings about dietary recommendations. Past research has measured nutrition backlash using the nutrition backlash scale (NBS) and found that it is negatively related to the consumption of fruits and vegetables. The aim of this study was to examine several aspects of the NBS, including factor structure, discriminant validity, and relationship to demographic characteristics and health behaviors.

Methods: Adults were recruited to participate in two studies. Study 1 (N = 480) included measures of nutritional backlash, information overload, worry, fatalism, and nutrition-related behaviors. Study 2 (N = 399) was a follow-up that examined the factor structure of the NBS in a separate sample.

Results: In study 1, a six-item version of the NBS was found to be a good fit for the data and discriminant from overload, worry, and fatalism. NBS was higher for those with less education, non-white participants, and men. Individuals with higher backlash were less likely to look at nutritional labels and to use sunscreen. Study 2 confirmed the factor structure from study 1.

Conclusions: A six-item version of the NBS was found to be reliable, discriminant from related measures, higher in underserved groups (less-educated, non-white, and male participants), and related to nutrition label use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7508894PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2020.110949DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nutrition backlash
20
factor structure
12
discriminant validity
8
backlash scale
8
overload worry
8
worry fatalism
8
six-item version
8
version nbs
8
backlash
7
nbs
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!