A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: a hidden gem in predicting neoadjuvant treatment response in locally advanced rectal cancer? | LitMetric

Purpose: The link between the pro-inflammatory status, tumor aggressiveness and treatment response has been well established in multiple cancers. Various hematologic and biochemical variables representing surrogates for inflammation have been used as predictive markers. Our primary aim was to assess the prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in evaluating neoadjuvant treatment response in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods: We included 60 consecutive patients with LARC, admitted for surgery, after completing a standard full-course neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy regimen. NLR and other hematologic parameters were collected one day prior to surgery. Treatment response was assessed on the resection specimens.

Results: On univariate analysis, poor responders had a significantly higher NLR value when compared with good responders: 5.81 (5.40-7.28) vs. 3.51 (2.36-4.04), p<0.0001. NLR retained its significance on multivariate analysis, with an OR of 3.51 (1.54-6.57), p=0.001. A NLR cut-off value of 4.50 had the best predictive value for poor response, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 83.3% (p<0.001). Other hematologic ratios, such as the derived NLR (dNLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were also significant predictors for poor response, although to a lesser extent when compared to NLR.

Conclusion: NLR is a simple and cost-effective predictor for neoadjuvant treatment response in LARC. As more data is generated, clear cut-off values could provide valuable insight regarding the management of LARC.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment response
16
neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
8
neoadjuvant treatment
8
response locally
8
locally advanced
8
advanced rectal
8
ratio hidden
4
hidden gem
4
gem predicting
4
predicting neoadjuvant
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!