Introduction And Objectives: Recent randomized controlled trials have evaluated the benefit of extended antithrombotic therapy in secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the numerous and strict enrollment criteria may limit the validity and reproducibility of the published results in clinical practice. Our goal was to estimate the eligibility for participation in two randomized clinical trials in a group of patients followed for ACS.

Methods: We applied the enrollment criteria of two randomized clinical trials (PEGASUS and COMPASS) to consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention in an ACS registry between January 2016 and June 2017.

Results: A total of 780 patients were included in the final analysis. The proportion of patients fulfilling the trial enrollment criteria was 35.9% for PEGASUS and 32.1% for COMPASS. The proportion of patients eligible for both trials was 17.7% and 49.7% of patients were eligible for at least one trial. The need for anticoagulant therapy was the most common reason for exclusion on the PEGASUS criteria (46.2%) and the presence of high bleeding risk was the most common reason for exclusion on the COMPASS criteria (61.5%).

Conclusions: Approximately 50% of real-world patients are not eligible for the antithrombotic strategies applied in these trials. Since this non-eligible population is at greater risk of events, further studies are needed to confirm the applicability of these strategies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2020.02.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

enrollment criteria
12
patients eligible
12
extended antithrombotic
8
antithrombotic therapy
8
therapy secondary
8
secondary prevention
8
prevention acute
8
acute coronary
8
coronary syndrome
8
randomized clinical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!