Practices in Triage and Transfer of Critically Ill Patients: A Qualitative Systematic Review of Selection Criteria.

Crit Care Med

Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Published: November 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to analyze and assess articles that outline the criteria for deciding whether to admit patients to critical care, particularly focusing on ICU resource allocation.
  • Researchers reviewed a total of 6,633 citations and selected 129 articles, which mainly included original research, guidelines, and reviews, leading to the identification of 200 unique triage and transport criteria.
  • The findings revealed that most criteria were more focused on exclusion rather than prioritization, and the study also categorized these criteria into four key themes: patient, condition, physician, and context.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To identify and appraise articles describing criteria used to prioritize or withhold a critical care admission.

Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, Medline, EBM Reviews, and CINAHL Complete databases. Gray literature searches and a manual review of references were also performed. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed.

Study Selection: We sought all articles and abstracts of original research as well as local, provincial, or national policies on the topic of ICU resource allocation. We excluded studies whose population of interest was neonatal, pediatric, trauma, or noncritically ill. Screening of 6,633 citations was conducted.

Data Extraction: Triage and/or transport criteria were extracted, based on type of article, methodology, publication year, and country. An appraisal scale was developed to assess the quality of identified articles. We also developed a robustness score to further appraise the robustness of the evidence supporting each criterion. Finally, all criteria were extracted, evaluated, and grouped by theme.

Data Synthesis: One-hundred twenty-nine articles were included. These were mainly original research (34%), guidelines (26%), and reviews (21%). Among them, we identified 200 unique triage and transport criteria. Most articles highlighted an exclusion (71%) rather than a prioritization mechanism (17%). Very few articles pertained to transport of critically ill patients (4%). Criteria were classified in one of four emerging themes: patient, condition, physician, and context. The majority of criteria used were nonspecific. No study prospectively evaluated the implementation of its cited criteria.

Conclusions: This systematic review identified 200 criteria classified within four themes that may be included when devising triage programs including the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. We identified significant knowledge gaps where research would assist in improving existing triage criteria and guidelines, aiming to decrease arbitrary decisions and variability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493782PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004624DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

criteria
9
critically ill
8
ill patients
8
systematic review
8
transport criteria
8
criteria extracted
8
identified 200
8
criteria classified
8
articles
6
practices triage
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!