Background: Sending clinical letters to patients is common practice in CAMHS. Ease of reading and understanding is important for patients. Readability formulae are feasible and quick ways to assess this.
Method: Clinical letters sent to patients were analysed for readability and whether they reached a preset threshold. Factors influencing readability were investigated.
Results: Most letters were less easily readable than is appropriate. Letters written directly to patients were more readable than copied letters.
Conclusions: Patients sometimes receive letters that are unlikely to be easily readable. Word processing packages contain readability formulae that could be used to check and improve readability of letters.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00624.x | DOI Listing |
Blood Cancer J
January 2025
Myeloma Research Group, Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Am J Emerg Med
January 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lancet
January 2025
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Arch Dis Child
January 2025
Department of Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Pharmacol Res
January 2025
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Xiangtan Central Hospital (The affiliated hospital of Hunan university), Xiangtan 411100, China. Electronic address:
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!