Objective: To compare the effects of presurgical infant orthopedics using 2 different methods, that is, the Dynacleft with Nasal elevator system versus the modified Grayson's technique in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Design: Prospective comparative cohort study.
Materials And Methods: Twenty-eight patients were divided into 2 groups, that is, consisting of 14 patients who underwent correction with DynaCleft with Nasal elevator system and consisting of 14 patients undergoing correction using the modified Grayson technique. Maxillary cast measurements were taken at 2-time intervals (pre- and posttreatment) to assess various parameters using a laser scanning machine (C500 Solutionix) and 3D software (GOM Inspect). Similarly, standardized anterior-posterior and worm's-eye view photographs using a custom box were taken and imported to Adobe Photoshop CS6 for measurements. Paired test and independent test were used to compare intra- and intergroup changes, respectively.
Results: The analysis of cast (primary outcome) and photographic (secondary outcome) measurements showed improved nasal asymmetry and alveolar correction in both groups which showed no significant intergroup difference when assessed using the independent test ( > .05). Group A showed higher chances (42.8%) of causing a T-shaped defect (due to excessive mesial-inward rotation of the minor segment) when compared to the Group B possibly due to a more controlled molding vector ( < .05).
Conclusion: Both methods proved effective in improving the nasal asymmetry, reducing the alveolar cleft gap, and approximating the lips together; but care must be taken when applying the alveolar molding vector in the Dynacleft system.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1055665620948630 | DOI Listing |
Arch Craniofac Surg
June 2024
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Background: The introduction of presurgical nasoalveolar molding represented a significant departure from traditional molding methods. Developed by Grayson and colleagues in 1993, this technique combines an intraoral molding device with a nasal molding stent. This study aimed to compare the Grayson nasoalveolar molding appliance versus DynaCleft appliance as two methods of presurgical nasoalveolar molding.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCleft Palate Craniofac J
April 2024
Smile Train Centre, Sant Paramanand Hospital, Delhi, Delhi, India.
Objective: Evaluate facial changes after Presurgical Naso-Alveolar Molding (PNAM) in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients treated with Modified Grayson Technique and AlignerNAM (with DynaCleft nasal elevator) using a 3D facial scan.
Design: Randomised clinical trial.
Setting: Institutional study.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg
December 2023
Department of Pedodontics, PGIDS, Rohtak, India.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
February 2021
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 79148Institute of Dental Studies and Technologies, Kadrabad, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Objective: To compare the effects of presurgical infant orthopedics using 2 different methods, that is, the Dynacleft with Nasal elevator system versus the modified Grayson's technique in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Design: Prospective comparative cohort study.
Materials And Methods: Twenty-eight patients were divided into 2 groups, that is, consisting of 14 patients who underwent correction with DynaCleft with Nasal elevator system and consisting of 14 patients undergoing correction using the modified Grayson technique.
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am
May 2016
Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Over the last decade, presurgical orthopedic molding for the patient with cleft lip and palate has become much more common; it is even reasonable to assume it may be the standard of care for those wide unilateral and bilateral clefts with substantial dentofacial deformities. In 2013, there was a comparative study of nasoalveolar molding methods, comparing the Grayson-NAM device and DynaCleft. The results showed the 2 to be equivocal with both methods significantly reducing the cleft width and improving the nasal asymmetry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!