Objective: To compare the effects of presurgical infant orthopedics using 2 different methods, that is, the Dynacleft with Nasal elevator system versus the modified Grayson's technique in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Design: Prospective comparative cohort study.

Materials And Methods: Twenty-eight patients were divided into 2 groups, that is, consisting of 14 patients who underwent correction with DynaCleft with Nasal elevator system and consisting of 14 patients undergoing correction using the modified Grayson technique. Maxillary cast measurements were taken at 2-time intervals (pre- and posttreatment) to assess various parameters using a laser scanning machine (C500 Solutionix) and 3D software (GOM Inspect). Similarly, standardized anterior-posterior and worm's-eye view photographs using a custom box were taken and imported to Adobe Photoshop CS6 for measurements. Paired test and independent test were used to compare intra- and intergroup changes, respectively.

Results: The analysis of cast (primary outcome) and photographic (secondary outcome) measurements showed improved nasal asymmetry and alveolar correction in both groups which showed no significant intergroup difference when assessed using the independent test ( > .05). Group A showed higher chances (42.8%) of causing a T-shaped defect (due to excessive mesial-inward rotation of the minor segment) when compared to the Group B possibly due to a more controlled molding vector ( < .05).

Conclusion: Both methods proved effective in improving the nasal asymmetry, reducing the alveolar cleft gap, and approximating the lips together; but care must be taken when applying the alveolar molding vector in the Dynacleft system.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1055665620948630DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dynacleft nasal
12
presurgical infant
8
infant orthopedics
8
modified grayson
8
unilateral cleft
8
cleft lip
8
nasal elevator
8
elevator system
8
consisting patients
8
independent test
8

Similar Publications

Background: The introduction of presurgical nasoalveolar molding represented a significant departure from traditional molding methods. Developed by Grayson and colleagues in 1993, this technique combines an intraoral molding device with a nasal molding stent. This study aimed to compare the Grayson nasoalveolar molding appliance versus DynaCleft appliance as two methods of presurgical nasoalveolar molding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Evaluate facial changes after Presurgical Naso-Alveolar Molding (PNAM) in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients treated with Modified Grayson Technique and AlignerNAM (with DynaCleft nasal elevator) using a 3D facial scan.

Design: Randomised clinical trial.

Setting: Institutional study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Cleft lip and palate is a common congenital defect that significantly affects children and their families, necessitating careful management to improve the child's quality of life.
  • The aim of the study is to create a treatment algorithm that aids clinicians in selecting appropriate treatment options based on the defect's severity and type.
  • Various presurgical techniques, such as nasoalveolar moulding and different appliance options, are discussed to enhance aesthetic and functional outcomes, with a decision-making tree designed to assist healthcare professionals in offering optimal treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare the effects of presurgical infant orthopedics using 2 different methods, that is, the Dynacleft with Nasal elevator system versus the modified Grayson's technique in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Design: Prospective comparative cohort study.

Materials And Methods: Twenty-eight patients were divided into 2 groups, that is, consisting of 14 patients who underwent correction with DynaCleft with Nasal elevator system and consisting of 14 patients undergoing correction using the modified Grayson technique.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Over the last decade, presurgical orthopedic molding for the patient with cleft lip and palate has become much more common; it is even reasonable to assume it may be the standard of care for those wide unilateral and bilateral clefts with substantial dentofacial deformities. In 2013, there was a comparative study of nasoalveolar molding methods, comparing the Grayson-NAM device and DynaCleft. The results showed the 2 to be equivocal with both methods significantly reducing the cleft width and improving the nasal asymmetry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!