Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Perianal and genital defects occur because of a vast etiology making the reconstruction of function and esthetics remain challenging. Depending on the extent of the defect, different techniques have been employed for coverage including skin grafts, local skin flaps, musculocutaneous flaps, and pedicled perforator flaps. The pedicled vertical posteromedial thigh (vPMT) flap is a new perforator flap that has rarely been employed for this kind of reconstruction. The purpose of this article is to focus on the vPMT perforator flap, which is mainly used as a propeller flap, for reconstructing the perianal and genital region as a feasible option in this area.
Patients And Methods: From July 2013 to December 2018, we treated twelve patients with extensive perianal and/or genital defects with 21 pedicled vPMT flaps. Three patients needed unilateral reconstruction, while 9 patients bilateral needed bilateral reconstruction. The location of the defects included the scrotal region (3 cases), the perianal region (8 cases), and the vulvar region (5 cases), whereby some cases had combined defects.
Results: The flap sizes varied from 5-9 cm in width to 18-35 cm in length and all flaps were harvested as perforator-based island flaps. The flap movements used for defect coverage included V-Y advancement in three cases and rotation in propeller fashion in eighteen cases. All flaps survived without any major complications and all donor sites were closed primarily.
Conclusion: Our case series showed an exemplary model for the coverage of the perianal and genital region by using the pedicle vPMT flap and the achievement of a sustainable treatment with a minor morbidity of the donor site. We believe that the vPMT flap could be an alternative option for the reconstruction of the perianal and genital region and could be inserted in the armamentarium of the reconstructive microsurgeon.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.001 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!