How do we Classify a Central Tumor? Results of a Multidisciplinary Survey from the SEPAR Thoracic Oncology Area.

Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed)

Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Barcelona, España; Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, España. Electronic address:

Published: May 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), centrally located tumors often indicate higher risk for hidden mediastinal involvement, prompting guidelines for more invasive staging.
  • A survey of 430 medical professionals in Spain highlighted inconsistencies in defining tumor centrality, with "lesions in contact with hilar structures" as the most favored definition.
  • The findings show a general lack of agreement on definitions and classifications used for tumor location, suggesting a need for clearer guidelines.

Article Abstract

Introduction: In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and normal mediastinal imaging tests, centrally located tumors have greater occult mediastinal involvement. Clinical guidelines, therefore, recommend invasive mediastinal staging in this situation. However, definitions of centrality in the different guidelines are inconsistent. The SEPAR Thoracic Oncology area aimed to evaluate the degree of familiarity with various concepts related to tumor site among professionals who see patients with NSCLC in Spain.

Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to members of Spanish medical societies involved in the management of NSCLC, structured according to the 3 aspects to be evaluated: 1) uniformity in the definition of central tumor location; 2) uniformity in the classification of lesions that extend beyond dividing lines; and 3) ability to delineate lesions in the absence of dividing lines.

Results: A total of 430 participants responded. The most voted definition of centrality was «lesions in contact with hilar structures» (49.7%). The lines most often chosen to delimit the hemitorax were concentric hilar lines (89%). Most participants (92.8%) classified tumors according to the side of the dividing line that contained most of their volume. Overall, 78.6% were able to correctly classify a central lesion in the absence of dividing lines.

Conclusions: In our survey, the most widely accepted definition of centrality is not one of the proposals specified in the clinical guidelines. The results reflect wide variability in the classification of tumor lesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2020.06.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

classify central
8
separ thoracic
8
thoracic oncology
8
oncology area
8
clinical guidelines
8
absence dividing
8
definition centrality
8
central tumor?
4
tumor? multidisciplinary
4
multidisciplinary survey
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!