A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

SELF-DESIGNATION OF THE TREATED EYE BEFORE INTRAVITREAL INJECTIONS: Prevalence and Predictors of Incorrect Calling. | LitMetric

Purpose: To identify risk factors for incorrect self-identification of the treatment eye before intravitreal injections.

Methods: This prospective study included consecutive patients who were asked to designate the eye for which the intravitreal injection was intended and were subsequently divided into two groups according to whether or not they identified the correct eye.

Results: Overall, 349 eyes (n = 349) were included, and 8.6% (n = 30) designated the incorrect eye or did not know which eye was intended for treatment. Incorrect designation was associated with diabetic macular edema (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33 [0.15-0.75]), first injection in the intended eye or ≥1 year since previous injection (OR = 0.34 [0.14-0.87]), Arabic native tongue (OR = 0.48 [0.22-1.01]), previous injection to the fellow eye (OR = 0.26 [0.10-0.64]), and concurrent treatment of both eyes (OR = 0.35 [0.16-0.74]). Multivariate analysis showed the first injection or ≥1 year since last injection in the treatment eye (R2 = 2.24%, P = 0.004, OR = 0.20 [0.07-0.57]) and previous injection in the fellow eye (R2 = 6.55%, P < 0.001, OR = 0.20 [0.07-0.52]) as significant independent predictors of incorrect identification.

Conclusion: Several factors are associated with a greater probability for incorrect patient's self-identification of the eye laterality intended for intravitreal injections. These findings may help identify patients with a higher risk of such potential errors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002956DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

eye intravitreal
12
previous injection
12
eye
10
intravitreal injections
8
predictors incorrect
8
treatment eye
8
injection intended
8
≥1 year
8
injection fellow
8
fellow eye
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!