A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effect of Oral Chinese Medicine Combined with Western Medicine on Cancer Pain: A Meta-Analysis. | LitMetric

Effect of Oral Chinese Medicine Combined with Western Medicine on Cancer Pain: A Meta-Analysis.

Chin J Integr Med

Traditional Chinese Medicine Department, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.

Published: September 2021

Objective: To assess the effect of oral Chinese medicine (OCM) combined with Western medicine (WM) on cancer pain.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and VIP databases were searched from their inception to September {dy2019}. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) treating cancer pain by Chinese medicine (CM) combined with WM were included. The primary outcome were total pain relief rate and the quality of life (QOL), and the other outcomes were the average daily dosage of analgesics, the primary time of pain, the analgesic duration time, and adverse events. The methodological quality of RCTs was assessed in accordance with Cochrane 5.1.0 handbook of systematic reviews of interventions. Evidence level was assessed by the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results: There were 1,087 patients in the 14 studies, with 544 in the experiment group and 543 in the control group. These studies were all conducted in China, and published between 2006 and {dy2019}. Compared with the WM, OCM combined with WM could significantly relieve the cancer pain [risk ratio (RR)=1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32, 1.56), improve QOL (RR=8.57, 95% CI: 4.25, 12.89), decrease the primary time of pain (RR=-0.20, 95% CI: -0.24, -0.16], prolong the analgesic duration time (RR=3.47, 95% CI: 2.09, 4.85), reduce the dosage of analgesics (RR=-19.52, 95% CI: -36.32, -2.72), and reduce side events (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.37, 0.65). Evidence levels for total pain relief rate, primary time of pain and side events were low, evidence level for QOL, analgesic duration time and average daily dosage of analgesics were very low.

Conclusions: Compared with the WM, OCM combined with WM could significantly relieve the cancer pain, improve the QOL, decrease the primary time of pain, prolong the analgesic duration time, reduce the dosage of analgesics and side events. The evidence levels were low or very low.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11655-020-3423-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cancer pain
16
dosage analgesics
16
primary time
16
time pain
16
analgesic duration
16
duration time
16
chinese medicine
12
ocm combined
12
side events
12
pain
10

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!