AI Article Synopsis

  • The purpose of this study was to guide radiation oncology centers in using Lutetium-177-dotatate (Lu) therapy for treating midgut neuroendocrine tumors, based on experiences from an expanded access protocol.
  • The methodology involved creating a dedicated treatment area, utilizing an IV pump for infusion, monitoring exposure levels, and assessing patient toxicity, along with conducting a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA).
  • Results showed 22 patients were treated successfully, with a significant reduction in nausea and emesis rates after changing to peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and improving the amino acid formulation, confirming Lu-dotatate can be safely administered in an outpatient setting.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To assist radiation oncology centers in implementing Lutetium-177-dotatate (Lu) radiopharmaceutical therapy for midgut neuroendocrine tumors. Here we describe our workflow and how it was revised based on our initial experience on an expanded access protocol (EAP).

Methods: A treatment team/area was identified. An IV-pump-based infusion technique was implemented. Exposure-based techniques were implemented to determine completion of administration, administered activity, and patient releasability. Acute toxicities were assessed at each fraction. A workflow failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) was performed.

Results: A total of 22 patients were treated: 11 patients during EAP (36 administrations) and 11 patients after EAP (44 administrations). Mean Lu infusion time was 37 min (range 26-65 min). Mean administered activity was 97% (range 90-99%). Mean patient exposures at 1 m were 1.9 mR/h (range 1.0-4.1 mR/h) post-Lu and 0.9 mR/h (range 0.4-1.8 mR/h) at discharge, rendering patients releasable with instructions. Treatment area was decontaminated and released same day. All patients in the EAP experienced nausea, and nearly half experienced emesis despite premedication with antiemetics. Peripheral IV-line complications occurred in six treatments (16.7%), halting administration in 2 cases (5.6%). We transitioned to peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-lines and revised amino acid formulary after the EAP. The second cohort of 11 patients after EAP were analyzed for PICC-line complications and acute toxicity. Nausea and emesis rates decreased (nausea G1+ 61%-27%; emesis G1+ 23%-7%), and no PICC complications were observed. FMEA revealed that a failure in amino acid preparation was the highest risk.

Conclusion: Lu-dotatate can be administered safely in an outpatient radiation oncology department.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.07.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients eap
16
initial experience
8
implementing lutetium-177-dotatate
8
lutetium-177-dotatate radiopharmaceutical
8
radiopharmaceutical therapy
8
radiation oncology
8
administered activity
8
eap administrations
8
amino acid
8
patients
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!