Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and anatomical features to predict the long-term outcomes in patients with fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided deferred lesions, verified by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

Background: Deferral of nonsignificant lesion by FFR is associated with a low risk of clinical events. However, the impact of combined information on clinical and anatomical factors is not well known.

Methods: The study included 459 patients with 552 intermediate lesions who had deferred revascularization on the basis of a nonischemic FFR (>0.80). Grayscale IVUS was examined simultaneously. The primary endpoint was patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) (a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and any revascularization) during 5-year follow-up.

Results: The rate of 5-year POCO was 9.8%. Diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio: 3.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.86 to 6.57; p < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (hazard ratio: 4.80; 95% CI: 1.57 to 14.63; p = 0.006), and positive remodeling (hazard ratio: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.03 to 4.03; p = 0.041) were independent predictors for POCO. When the lesions were classified according to the presence of the adverse clinical characteristics (diabetes, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) or adverse plaque characteristics (positive remodeling, plaque burden ≥70%), the risk of POCO was incrementally increased (4.3%, 13.6%, and 21.3%, respectively; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In patients with FFR-guided deferred lesions, 5-year clinical outcomes were excellent. Lesion-related anatomical factors from intravascular imaging as well as patient-related clinical factors could provide incremental information about future clinical risks.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.05.040DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ffr-guided deferred
8
clinical anatomical
8
influence anatomical
4
clinical
4
anatomical clinical
4
clinical characteristics
4
characteristics long-term
4
long-term prognosis
4
prognosis ffr-guided
4
deferred coronary
4

Similar Publications

Background: Limited large-scale, real-world data exist on the prevalence and clinical impact of discordance between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and nonhyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs).

Methods: The J-PRIDE registry (Clinical Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Resting Indices and Fractional Flow Reserve: A Prospective Multicenter Registry) prospectively enrolled 4304 lesions in 3200 patients from 20 Japanese centers. The lesions were classified into FFR+/NHPR-, FFR-/NHPR+, FFR+/NHPR+, or FFR-/NHPR groups according to cutoff values of 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) improves outcomes compared with angiography-guided PCI, however cardiac events still occur during long-term follow-up of FFR-negative patients. In the PREVENT study preventive PCI reduced cardiac-events in lesions which were FFR-negative (FFR > 0.80) and had intracoronary imaging defined vulnerable plaque.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Because the clinical benefit of antiplatelet therapy (APT) for patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease (CAD) remains poorly understood, we evaluated it in patients after fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided deferral of revascularization.

Methods And Results: From the J-CONFIRM (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients with Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry), we investigated 265 patients with deferred lesions who did not require APT for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A 2-year landmark analysis assessed the relationship between APT at 2 years and 5-year major cardiac adverse events (MACE: composite of all-cause death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clinical Value of Single-Projection Angiography-Derived FFR in Noninfarct-Related Artery.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv

May 2024

Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (W.K., K.H.C., D.H., T.K.P., J.H.Y., Y.B.S., S.-H.C., H.-C.G., J.-Y.H., J.M.L.).

Background: The Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (μFR) is an emerging technique that requires only 1 projection of coronary angiography with similar accuracy to quantitative flow ratio (QFR). However, it has not been validated for the evaluation of noninfarct-related artery (non-IRA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) settings. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of μFR and the safety of deferring non-IRA lesions with μFR >0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The FORZA trial (FFR or OCT Guidance to Revascularize Intermediate Coronary Stenosis Using Angioplasty) prospectively compared the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) for treatment decisions and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) optimization in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. Murray law-based quantitative-flow-ratio (μQFR) is a novel noninvasive method for the computation of FFR. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical impact of μQFR, FFR, or OCT guidance in FORZA trial lesions at 3-year follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!