A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Associations among palatal impaction of canine, sella turcica bridging, and ponticulus posticus (atlas arcuate foramen). | LitMetric

Introduction: The palatal impaction of canine (PIC) can be predicted by some head and neck skeletal anomalies or variants. Since studies on this regard (especially vertebral anomalies) are scarce, this study was conducted.

Methods: This case-control study was done on 46 PIC orthodontic patients (34 females, 12 males) and 46 control orthodontic patients (36 females, 10 males). The diagnosis of PIC was done on lateral cephalographs and panoramic radiographs. On cephalographs, sella turcica bridging (occurrence and severity) and ponticulus posticus (occurrence and severity) were assessed. Associations between PIC, sella bridging, and ponticulus posticus were examined statistically (α = 0.05, β ≤ 0.2).

Results: Cases' and controls' mean ages were 17.7 ± 4.0 and 17.4 ± 3.5, respectively. Of the case subjects, 22, 22, and 2 had respectively types I (normal), II, and III of sella bridging, while these numbers were 34, 12, and 0 in controls (chi-square P = 0.023 for severity, 0.010 for occurrence). Ponticulus posticus was observed in 28 cases (7 completed) and 17 controls (6 completed, P = 0.022 for occurrence, 0.056 for severity). Sella bridging was not associated with ponticulus posticus (Spearman P = 0.150). According to binary logistic regression, sella bridging can increase the odds of palatal canine impaction for OR = 2.8 times, while ponticulus posticus for OR = 2.6. Age and sex did not affect sella bridging or ponticulus posticus.

Conclusions: Both sella bridging and ponticulus posticus can predict an increased rate of PIC for more than 2.5 times.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02548-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ponticulus posticus
28
sella bridging
24
bridging ponticulus
16
palatal impaction
8
impaction canine
8
sella
8
sella turcica
8
bridging
8
turcica bridging
8
ponticulus
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!