AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the impact of home- and community-based services on elderly patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in Japan, particularly focusing on those enrolled in long-term care insurance (LTCI).
  • During the one-year follow-up, it found that while there was no significant difference in adverse outcomes for super-elderly patients (≥85 years), elderly patients (<85 years) using these services had a significantly lower rate of hospitalization and mortality after discharge.
  • The results suggest that home and community-based services are beneficial in preventing adverse events for elderly patients with AHF, while their impact on super-elderly patients remains unclear.

Article Abstract

Aim: In Japan, the long-term care insurance (LTCI) system is important for elderly people living at home; however, no clinical studies have revealed a relationship between home- or community-based services and outcomes in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).

Methods: This was a prospective multicenter cohort study of patients with AHF enrolled between April 2015 and August 2017. Patients aged ≥65 years with LTCI were divided into those receiving home- and community-based services (service users) and without home and community-based services (service non-users). The endpoint was defined as a composite endpoint, which included all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure after discharge. Subgroup analyses were performed for elderly patients (<85 years) or super-elderly patients (≥85 years).

Results: The study participants were eligible for LTCI two times more than community-dwelling people were. At the 1-year follow-up period, the rate of the composite endpoint showed no significant difference between service users and service non-users among all patients or super-elderly patients. However, in elderly patients, the rate of the composite endpoint was significantly lower among service users than service non-users. The difference was independently maintained even after adjustments for differences in comorbidities or in social backgrounds (adjusted hazard ratio 0.62; 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.99, and adjusted hazard ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.90, respectively).

Conclusions: In this study, adverse events following discharge of patients with AHF who used home- and community-based services were prevented only in elderly patients, not in super-elderly patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 967-973.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

community-based services
16
heart failure
16
home- community-based
12
long-term care
8
care insurance
8
outcomes patients
8
patients acute
8
acute heart
8
services service
8
patients
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!