AI Article Synopsis

  • - The Ontario government implemented hospital funding reforms in 2011 aimed at improving care quality through Quality-based Procedures (QBPs) that allocated pre-set funds for specific patient diagnoses and procedures.
  • - An evaluation from 2010-2017 showed mixed results; for instance, hip fracture patients had a 3.13% higher rate of returning to the hospital or dying after two years of the reforms, while prostate cancer surgery patients experienced a slight increase in hospital stay duration.
  • - Overall, the changes did not lead to significant improvements in patient access or quality of care across the province, although there were minor shifts in patient demographics regarding income levels based on specific conditions.

Article Abstract

Background: The Government of Ontario, Canada, announced hospital funding reforms in 2011, including Quality-based Procedures (QBPs) involving pre-set funds for managing patients with specific diagnoses/procedures. A key goal was to improve quality of care across the jurisdiction.

Methods: Interrupted time series evaluated the policy change, focusing on four QBPs (congestive heart failure, hip fracture surgery, pneumonia, prostate cancer surgery), on patients hospitalized 2010-2017. Outcomes included return to hospital or death within 30 days, acute length of stay (LOS), volume of admissions, and patient characteristics.

Results: At 2 years post-QBPs, the percentage of hip fracture patients who returned to hospital or died was 3.13% higher in absolute terms (95% CI: 0.37% to 5.89%) than if QBPs had not been introduced. There were no other statistically significant changes for return to hospital or death. For LOS, the only statistically significant change was an increase for prostate cancer surgery of 0.33 days (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.59). Volume increased for congestive heart failure admissions by 80 patients (95% CI: 2 to 159) and decreased for hip fracture surgery by 138 patients (95% CI: -183 to -93) but did not change for pneumonia or prostate cancer surgery. The percentage of patients who lived in the lowest neighborhood income quintile increased slightly for those diagnosed with congestive heart failure (1.89%; 95% CI: 0.51% to 3.27%) and decreased for those who underwent prostate cancer surgery (-2.08%; 95% CI: -3.74% to -0.43%).

Interpretation: This policy initiative involving a change to hospital funding for certain conditions was not associated with substantial, jurisdictional-level changes in access or quality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437861PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236480PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prostate cancer
16
cancer surgery
16
hospital funding
12
congestive heart
12
heart failure
12
hip fracture
12
ontario canada
8
interrupted time
8
time series
8
fracture surgery
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!