Touchless interaction devices have increasingly garnered attention for intraoperative imaging interaction, but there are limited recommendations on which touchless interaction mechanisms should be implemented in the operating room. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency, accuracy, and satisfaction of 2 current touchless interaction mechanisms-hand motion and body motion for intraoperative image interaction. We used the TedCas plugin for ClearCanvas DICOM viewer to display and manipulate CT images. Ten surgeons performed 5 image interaction tasks-step-through, pan, zoom, circle measure, and line measure-on the 3 input interaction devices-the Microsoft Kinect, the Leap Motion, and a mouse. The Kinect shared similar accuracy with the Leap Motion for most of the tasks. But it had an increased error rate in the step-through task. The Leap Motion led to shorter task completion time than the Kinect and was preferred by the surgeons, especially for the measure tasks. Our study suggests that hand tracking devices, such as the Leap Motion, should be used for intraoperative imagining manipulation tasks that require high precision.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1553350620947206DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

leap motion
20
motion intraoperative
12
image interaction
12
touchless interaction
12
kinect leap
8
intraoperative image
8
interaction
8
motion
7
leap
5
comparison kinect
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!