Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Pharyngeal Airway Volume and Craniofacial Morphology in Patients With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J

Department of Orthodontics, School and 499766Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Published: March 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated how the structure of the face and jaw affects air passage volume in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP).
  • Researchers compared 27 BCLP patients to 27 control patients aged 10 to 14, using advanced imaging techniques to measure pharyngeal airway volumes.
  • Results showed that BCLP patients had significantly smaller airway volumes and distinct craniofacial differences, suggesting that the skeletal structure impacts airway size and may contribute to respiratory issues.

Article Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the correlations between the craniofacial morphology and pharyngeal airway volume in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP).

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Tertiary hospital.

Participants: Twenty-seven patients with complete BCLP and 27 class I control patients, aged 10 to 14 years.

Main Outcome Measure: The pharyngeal airway volume and craniofacial morphology were evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography. Measurements were compared between groups and any correlations were identified.

Results: A significantly smaller total pharyngeal airway volume (TPV), oropharyngeal airway volume, and upper (UOPV) and lower (LOPV) oropharyngeal airway volume were found in patients with BCLP than in class I control patients, with no difference in the nasopharyngeal volume between groups. Furthermore, the craniofacial morphology measurements of N-Me, S-Go, Or-C, Ptm-C, Me-C, Co-Go, Go-Me, Ptm-Or, N-S-Ar, and Ar-Go-Me significantly differed between the BCLP and control groups (all < .05). Multiple regression analysis indicated that Ptm-C and Me-C; Ptm-C, Or-C, and Me-C; and Me-C explained 20.3%, 38.9%, and 17.1% of the variations in TPV ( = .025), UOPV ( = .002), and LOPV ( = .018), respectively.

Conclusions: Total pharyngeal airway volume, TPV, OPV, UOPV, and LOPV were significantly smaller in patients with BCLP than in class I controls. In patients with BCLP, the maxilla showed inhibited sagittal development and a retrograde position; moreover, the pharyngeal airway volume was weakly associated with the position of the maxilla and mandible relative to the coronal plane.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1055665620946982DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

airway volume
32
pharyngeal airway
24
craniofacial morphology
16
bclp class
12
patients bclp
12
volume
9
airway
8
volume craniofacial
8
patients
8
bilateral cleft
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!