Bioremediation of emerging micropollutants in irrigation water. The alternative of microalgae-based treatments.

J Environ Manage

GEMMA - Group of Environmental Engineering and Microbiology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, C/Jordi Girona 1-3, Building D1, E-08034, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address:

Published: November 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study looked at a semi-closed tubular photobioreactor (PBR) used to remove 35 different compounds from irrigation water that was a mix of reclaimed wastewater and agricultural runoff.
  • 21 of these compounds were found in the water, with some (like benzotriazoles) being only partially removed, while others (like benzophenone-3) showed variable removal rates, and certain pharmaceuticals achieved higher removal rates, generally between 60-100%.
  • The findings suggest that despite low biomass productivity, factors like reactor size, mixed cultures, and environmental conditions contribute to the PBR's effectiveness, making it a promising and sustainable alternative treatment option.

Article Abstract

The present study evaluated the efficiency of a semi-closed horizontal tubular photobioreactor (PBR) at demonstrative scale to remove a total of 35 target compounds, including benzotriazoles, benzophenones, antibiotics and different pharmaceuticals present in irrigation water in a peri-urban rural area. This water run through an open channel and was a mixture of reclaimed wastewater from a nearby wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and run-off from the different agricultural fields in the area. Most of the compounds studied are usually not fully eliminated during conventional wastewater treatment, which justifies the need to investigate alternative treatment strategies. A total of 21 of these compounds were detected in the irrigation water. Benzotriazoles were only partially removed after the microalgae treatment, with elimination rates similar to those of conventional WWTPs. The UV filter benzophenone-3 (BP3) showed variable removals, ranging from no elimination to 51%, whereas 4-methylbenzilidenecamphor (4MBC) was completely eliminated. Regarding pharmaceuticals, average removals were higher, in the range of 60-100%, with the exception of the antibiotics sulfamethoxazole (46%) and sulfapyridine, which was not removed. Despite the low biomass productivity of the PBR, parameters such as the size of the reactors, the specific mixed cultures developed and the high temperatures and pH in the closed system may account for the overall good results, The efficiency and sustainability of these systems make them a solid, feasible treatment choice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111081DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

irrigation water
12
wastewater treatment
8
treatment
5
bioremediation emerging
4
emerging micropollutants
4
micropollutants irrigation
4
water
4
water alternative
4
alternative microalgae-based
4
microalgae-based treatments
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!