Broad Outcome Measures May Underestimate Effectiveness: An Instrument Comparison Study.

Child Adolesc Ment Health

Department of Child Psychiatry, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Published: September 2005

Background:   Outcome measures are routinely used in child and adolescent mental health services to demonstrate the effectiveness or otherwise of interventions.

Methods:   We followed up a consecutive sample from a large teaching hospital's Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) service for young people, comparing improvements using instruments of differing broadness.

Results:   The effect size of improvement decreased as the breadth of the questionnaire increased.

Conclusion:   Specialist clinics are recommended to use two questionnaires: a broad one to facilitate comparability with other clinics, and a narrow one to maximise power to detect significant changes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2005.00350.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

outcome measures
8
broad outcome
4
measures underestimate
4
underestimate effectiveness
4
effectiveness instrument
4
instrument comparison
4
comparison study
4
study background
4
4
background  
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!