Objectives: Acute and chronic allograft rejection have been continuously an important obstacle in the follow-up of renal transplant recipients. During clinical management, several factors acting simultaneously result in acute rejection and chronic allograft nephropathy. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases are responsible for the organization of the extracellular matrix and play roles in cell proliferation and cellular invasion. Changes in matrix metalloproteinase expression levels have been reported to be associated with renal allograft rejection and interstitial fibrosis. In this study, we aimed to investigate functional polymorphisms of MMP2, MMP9, and TIMP2 genes in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Materials And Methods: Our study included 68 kidney transplant recipients and 58 control patients. The kidney transplant recipient group was further divided into 2 subgroups: no graft rejection (n = 47) and graft rejection (n =21). MMP2 -735C >T (rs2285053), MMP2 -1306C >T (rs243865), MMP2 -1575G >A (rs243866), MMP9 c.-1562C >T (rs3918242), TIMP2 -418G >C (rs8179090), and TIMP2 303C > T (rs2277698) polymorphisms were analyzed with the use of polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment-length polymorphism methods. Allele prevalence was compared with reference values of the control group, and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested.

Results: Mean ages were 16.7 ± 3.9 years for the study group and 14.8 ± 5.6 years for the control group. The mean follow-up time after transplant was 37.7 ± 7.9 months. We compared allele frequencies in the 2 groups and calculated a statistically significant difference in rs2285053, rs243865, rs243866, rs3918242, rs8179090, and rs2277698 polymorphism frequencies between the transplant recipients and control patients. When the transplant recipient group was compared in itself with regard to allograft rejection, all investigated polymorphisms except TIMP2 -418G >C (rs8179090) revealed a statistically significant difference between those with and without rejection (P < .05).

Conclusions: Matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors could be important predictive biological markers for the follow-up of kidney transplant recipients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.6002/ect.2020.0036DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transplant recipients
20
allograft rejection
16
matrix metalloproteinases
12
metalloproteinases tissue
12
renal transplant
12
kidney transplant
12
transplant
9
rejection
8
pediatric renal
8
chronic allograft
8

Similar Publications

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biliary tract cancers (BTC) pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multiphase computed tomography (CT) have been the preferred imaging modalities for diagnosis, staging, and surveillance of patients with these malignancies. The best clinical outcomes depend on the appropriate selection of treatment options from the tools available in neo-adjuvant therapy, surgical resection, locoregional therapy, liver transplantation, and adjuvant therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a key therapeutic approach for pediatric patients with hematologic and non-hematologic disorders. However, post-transplant pulmonary complications remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs) are essential for the early detection of pulmonary dysfunction, yet their application in pediatric HSCT recipients has yielded inconsistent results.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The clinical characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease (dnIBD) diagnosed after solid organ transplant (SOT) are not well-described, particularly since the advent of biologic therapy for treatment of IBD.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of SOT recipients between 2010 and 2022 at the University of Minnesota Medical Center who were diagnosed with IBD after transplant.

Results: Of 89 patients at our center with IBD and a history of SOT, five (5.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The Swiss allocation system for kidney transplantation has evolved over time to balance medical urgency, immunological compatibility, and waiting time. Since the introduction of the transplantation law in 2007, which imposed organ allocation on a national level, the algorithm has been optimized. Initially based on waiting time, HLA compatibility, and crossmatch performed by cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity techniques, the system moved in 2012 to a score including HLA compatibility, waiting time, anti-HLA antibodies detected by the Luminex technology, and a virtual crossmatch.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!