Food and Drug Administration and Institutional Review Board Approval of a Novel Prehospital Informed Consent Process for Emergency Research.

Prehosp Emerg Care

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (JM); Department of Pharmacy, UC Health - University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (CD); Department of Surgery, United States Air Force and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (CRS); Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (CL); University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (MJL). Revision received July 14, 2020; accepted for publication July 30, 2020.

Published: August 2021

Research on the management of acute pain in the prehospital setting is fraught with challenges. The prehospital setting is complex due to constrained time, resources, and training. Research activities must not interfere with the underlying clinical priorities of immediate patient stabilization and rapid transport to an appropriate hospital. The patient's pain, fear, and anxiety immediately after a traumatic event may interfere with undertaking an adequate informed consent process.Pain management trials do not satisfy the criteria for application of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 21 CFR 50.24 exception from informed consent. While nonstandard informed consent processes exist, waiver or alteration of informed consent may be limited if Institutional Review Boards or the FDA consider these studies to involve more than minimal risk related to the setting of the study, even if the interventions themselves might involve no more than minimal risk in other settings. In addition, any study requiring an Investigational New Drug application requires fully documented standard informed consent.Emergency Medical Services agencies and fire departments become research institutions, and paramedics become study staff, but both the institutions and the staff often lack experience conducting human subjects research and are rarely formally affiliated with the academic institution overseeing the research. As such, additional administrative burdens must be overcome in interventional prehospital studies, including additional training in the study protocol, research operations, and human subjects protections. Institutions conducting federally funded studies commit to regulations covering human subjects protections in the form of a Federalwide Assurance (FWA); prehospital organizations participating in research must either obtain an FWA or have coverage extended to them from an academic partner.We describe how these challenges were addressed during Institutional Review Board review and approval of an FDA-regulated randomized placebo-controlled trial of intranasal ketamine (vs. placebo) in acutely injured patients receiving standard of care fentanyl for prehospital pain management (NCT02866071). To our knowledge, this trial is the first instance in the United States of paramedics screening, consenting, enrolling, and administering study medications to patients without direct, real-time support from a dedicated clinical research team.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2020.1806969DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

informed consent
20
institutional review
12
human subjects
12
food drug
8
drug administration
8
review board
8
prehospital setting
8
involve minimal
8
minimal risk
8
subjects protections
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!