The utility of a computerised clinical decision support system intervention in home medicines review: A mixed-methods process evaluation.

Res Social Adm Pharm

NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.

Published: April 2021

Background: Use of high-risk medications is common and associated with adverse effects in older adults, including those living with dementia. A Computerised Clinical Decision Support System (CCDSS) called G-MEDSS© (Goal-directed Medication Review Electronic Decision Support System) contains tools that identify medications with anticholinergic and sedative effects and align older adult's health and medication goals of care with medication management strategies.

Objectives: To describe the utility of a CCDSS called G-MEDSS in Home Medicines Review (HMR) by an accredited clinical pharmacist (ACP) using a mixed-methods process evaluation method.

Methods: A mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted as part of a nation-wide cluster-randomised clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of implementing G-MEDSS in HMR. Data were collected from ACPs and HMR recipients (the patient) using a feedback survey (ACPs and HMR recipients) and one-on-one telephone interviews (HMR recipients). Quantitative and qualitative data were combined at the start of analysis. Content analysis of the qualitative data was conducted, and emerging categories were linked to quantitative data.

Results: Feedback surveys were completed by eight ACPs and 26 HMR recipients; 11 HMR recipients completed one-on-one telephone interviews. Overall, ACPs and HMR recipients who received the intervention reported a positive attitude towards the utility of G-MEDSS in HMR. ACPs reported that G-MEDSS enhanced their ability to make evidence-based recommendations about anticholinergic and sedative medications, and to better align HMR recommendations with HMR recipients' goals of care. However, ACPs described that it was difficult to obtain goals of care from HMR recipients. HMR recipients gave mixed reports about the ACPs consultations: some HMR recipients reported that they were engaged in discussions about their views on medications, whilst other participants reported that discussions about their concerns towards medications and goals was limited.

Conclusions: This study suggests that a CCDSS, such as G-MEDSS, demonstrates good utility to assist ACPs to identify and assess anticholinergic and sedative medications. Given the mixed feedback from the ACPs on the different components of the G-MEDSS, further refinement of these tools and their use in combination in practice may be needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.06.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hmr recipients
36
acps hmr
16
hmr
14
decision support
12
support system
12
mixed-methods process
12
process evaluation
12
anticholinergic sedative
12
goals care
12
acps
9

Similar Publications

Using machine learning for personalized prediction of longitudinal coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine responses in transplant recipients.

Am J Transplant

December 2024

Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (TGHRI), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • The study focuses on how well different AI models can predict COVID-19 vaccine responses in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, who are at higher risk due to weakened immune systems.
  • It examines various traditional and deep learning models, concluding that a new routed LSTM model outperformed others in accuracy for predicting antibody levels 12 months post-vaccination.
  • The research highlights critical factors like age and immunosuppression that affect vaccine responses, suggesting AI could help customize vaccination strategies for vulnerable populations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Health outcomes following provision of Home Medicines Reviews for older people receiving aged care services at home.

Res Social Adm Pharm

November 2024

University of South Australia, UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Background: The impact of Home Medicines Reviews (HMRs) on long-term health outcomes among individuals receiving long-term in-home aged care services is unknown.

Objectives: To examine associations between HMR provision and hospitalization, long-term care facility (LTCF) entry and mortality among older people receiving long-term in-home aged care services.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included individuals aged 65-105 years from three Australian states who accessed in-home aged care services between 2013 and 2017.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Immune-suppressed solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) display impaired humoral responses to COVID-19 vaccination, but T cell responses are incompletely understood. SARS-CoV-2 variants Omicron BA.4/5 (BA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cytomegalovirus associated severe pneumonia in three liver transplant recipients.

J Infect Dev Ctries

November 2020

Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.

Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV), is the most common opportunistic infection, remains a cause of life-threatening disease and allograft rejection in liver transplant (LT) recipients. The purpose of this case series is to state that CMV may lead to severe pneumonia along with other bacteria.

Methodology: CMV pneumonia was diagnosed with the thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan findings, bronchoscopic biopsy, real time quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) and clinical symptoms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Liver grafts from pediatric donors represent a small fraction of grafts transplanted into adult recipients, and their use in adults requires special consideration of donor size to prevent perioperative complications. In the past, graft weight or volume ratios have been adopted from the living donor liver transplant literature to guide clinicians; however, these metrics are not regularly available to surgeons accepting deceased donor organs. In this study, we evaluated all pediatric-to-adult liver transplants in the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database from 1987 to 2019, stratified by donor age and donor-recipient height mismatch ratio (HMR; defined as donor height/recipient height).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!