Golf swing segmentation with inertial measurement units (IMUs) is an essential process for swing analysis using wearables. However, no attempt has been made to apply machine learning models to estimate and divide golf swing phases. In this study, we proposed and verified two methods using machine learning models to segment the full golf swing into five major phases, including before and after the swing, from every single IMU attached to a body part. Proposed bidirectional long short-term memory-based and convolutional neural network-based methods rely on characteristics that automatically learn time-series features, including sequential body motion during a golf swing. Nine professional and eleven skilled male golfers participated in the experiment to collect swing data for training and verifying the methods. We verified the proposed methods using leave-one-out cross-validation. The results revealed average segmentation errors of 5-92 ms from each IMU attached to the head, wrist, and waist, accurate compared to the heuristic method in this study. In addition, both proposed methods could segment all the swing phases using only the acceleration data, bringing advantage in terms of power consumption. This implies that swing-segmentation methods using machine learning could be applied to various motion-analysis environments by dividing motion phases with less restriction on IMU placement.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7472298 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20164466 | DOI Listing |
J Sport Rehabil
January 2025
College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Context: Guidelines for various movement assessments often instruct clinicians to conduct testing without a warm-up. Warm-ups are commonly performed to increase heart rate, decrease stiffness, and prepare for sport-specific demands. Since athletes typically complete a warm-up prior to sport participation, evaluating biomechanics in this condition may provide a better indication of their bodies' physical capabilities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Strength Cond Res
January 2025
London Sport Institute, Middlesex University, London, United Kingdom.
Watson, A, Murray, A, Coughlan, D, Wells, J, Ehlert, A, Xu, J, Turner, A, and Bishop, C. Understanding training load in golf: A survey of swing coaches, performance practitioners, and medical staff. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): e20-e29, 2025-The present study aimed to investigate the current opinions and practices of golf coaches, performance practitioners, and medical staff working in golf, on the topic of monitoring training load in the sport.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Case Rep
December 2024
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA.
BACKGROUND Due to the complexity of the golf swing, poor form affects performance and lead to injuries in the spine and extremities. The Titleist Performance Institute (TPI) has created a movement screen to identify a golfer's physical limitations. The TPI includes 16 movement patterns within a golfer's swing that could lead to poor performance, dysfunction, and pain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Funct Morphol Kinesiol
November 2024
Physical Education School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Sensors (Basel)
October 2024
Integrated Movement Studies, Alfred University, Alfred, NY 14802, USA.
This study introduces an innovative integration of Laban Movement Analysis (LMA) with biomechanical principles to examine the golf swing dynamics from an ecological perspective. Traditionally, LMA focuses on the qualitative aspects of movement, often isolated from external influences. This research bridges that gap by investigating how golfers manage and adapt to the inertial forces of the club throughout the swing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!