[Clinical differential indication : Wearables vs implantables].

Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol

Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Deutschland.

Published: September 2020

In order to document arrhythmias, indicated due to symptoms or for prognostic purposes, both invasive and noninvasive possibilities for ECG monitoring are available. The choice of the device for monitoring depends mainly on the frequency of arrhythmias. If they occur less than once a month, long-term monitoring becomes necessary which either continuously monitors the rhythm by an implantable device (implantables) or by wearable systems (wearables) which usually register the ECG discontinuously. Because wearables, e.g. smartphones, are basically ubiquitously available, they may be used for ECG monitoring. This paper comments on the use of implantables and wearables for the detection of atrial fibrillation and the documentation of symptomatic arrhythmias in syncope or palpitations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00399-020-00714-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ecg monitoring
8
[clinical differential
4
differential indication
4
wearables
4
indication wearables
4
wearables implantables]
4
implantables] order
4
order document
4
document arrhythmias
4
arrhythmias indicated
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!