A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe. | LitMetric

Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe.

Trop Anim Health Prod

Central Veterinary Laboratory, Division of Veterinary Technical Services, Ministry of Lands, Agriculture, Water and Rural Resettlement, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Published: November 2020

Resistance of one host and three host ticks on cattle to amitraz was studied using samples from five diptanks in the Domboshawa Communal Land Area of Zimbabwe. A random tick profile and a questionnaire survey on the tick control practices of the area were also carried out. Engorged Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and Amblyomma hebraeum females were randomly collected from cattle presented for dipping at the 5 diptanks and were allowed to oviposit separately at T: 28 °C and RH: 85-95%. Larvae obtained were tested for resistance against various amitraz concentrations (1-0.0078125%) using the Larval Packet Test (LPT) and were compared with susceptible reference strains of R. (B.) decoloratus (Makuti strain, 2017), R. appendiculatus (Lake Chivero strain, 2015) and A. hebraeum (Lake Mutirikwi strain, 2017). The most abundant tick species were R. (B.) decoloratus (27.2%), Hyalomma rufipes (20.0%), H. truncatum (16.0%), R. appendiculatus (12.0%) and R. evertsi evertsi (11.9%). Amblyomma hebraeum (8.6%) and A. variegatum (1.8%) were the least common in the collection; this suggests that they were not well established in Domboshawa. Low amitraz resistance (RL = I) was detected only in R. (B.) decoloratus at 2 of the 5 diptanks. In the future, decentralised tick control due to inadequate and inconsistent supply of acaricides could introduce a number of factors which could contribute towards resistance development.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02364-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ticks cattle
8
cattle amitraz
8
tick control
8
amblyomma hebraeum
8
strain 2017
8
resistance
5
resistance ticks
4
amitraz
4
amitraz zimbabwe
4
zimbabwe resistance
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!