Comparison of Clinical Options: High-Fidelity Manikin-Based and Virtual Simulation.

Nurse Educ

Author Affiliations: Assistant Professor (Dr Díaz), Associate Professor (Drs Anderson and Quelly), Instructor (Ms Hill), and Research Assistant (Ms Lynn), Department of Nursing Practice, University of Central Florida, Orlando; and PhD Candidate (Ms Clark), School of Nursing, Community Health Systems, University of California, San Francisco.

Published: June 2021

Background: Minimal evidence compares nursing student outcomes when replacing clinical hours with manikin-based high-fidelity patient simulation (HFPS) or virtual simulation.

Purpose: The study aims were to compare differences in outcomes: (1) between 2 intervention groups (HFPS or virtual simulation) when replacing 25% of pediatric/obstetrics clinical hours and (2) pass/fail for clinical practice between the intervention groups and a face-to-face clinical group (control).

Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted to determine differences in knowledge between intervention groups participating in 6 pediatric/obstetrics simulation scenarios.

Results: No differences in composite knowledge were found between simulation groups (P = .319). There also was no difference in clinical practice pass/fail among the groups.

Conclusions: HFPS and virtual simulation were equally effective in achieving learning goals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000906DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

virtual simulation
12
hfps virtual
12
intervention groups
12
clinical hours
8
clinical practice
8
simulation
6
clinical
5
comparison clinical
4
clinical options
4
options high-fidelity
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!