In his book, The Material Theory of Induction, Norton argues that the quest for a universal formal theory or 'schema' for analogical inference should be abandoned. In its place, he offers the "material theory of analogy": each analogical inference is "powered" by a local fact of analogy rather than by any formal schema. His minimalist model promises a straightforward, fact-based approach to the evaluation and justification of analogical inferences. This paper argues that although the rejection of universal schemas is justified, Norton's positive theory is limited in scope: it works well only for a restricted class of analogical inferences. Both facts and quasi-formal criteria have roles to play in a theory of analogical reasoning.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.01.003 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!